Privatization needs a roadblock
February 4, 2007
Daniel Schulman,
The Roanoke Times
If you've ever traveled cross-country
on Interstate 90, you've driven the
Indiana Toll Road, a major trucking
artery that stretches 157 miles across
the length of northern Indiana. What you
may not know is that last June, the
"Main Street of the Midwest," as it's
locally known, was turned over to a
foreign consortium -- made up of the
Spanish construction firm
Cintra and
Macquarie Infrastructure Group (MIG) of
Australia -- in exchange for $3.8
billion.
The privatization of the nation's
highways, a trend touched off in 2005
when Chicago sold a 99-year-lease on the
Chicago Skyway to the same
consortium,
has so far received little attention. It
is, however, big news in the investment
banking world and major firms such as
Goldman Sachs and the Carlyle Group have
already set up infrastructure funds to
invest in what they expect to be a very
lucrative market.
Goldman, the primary dealmaker in the
toll road market thus far, is pushing
privatization aggressively around the
country, advising Indiana and other
states considering privatization even as
it has created a fund whose sole purpose
is to maximize returns by picking up
infrastructures for the best price
possible.
The idea seems to be catching on.
States including New York, Pennsylvania
and New Jersey have recently raised the
possibility of leasing major turnpikes,
while other states, from Florida to
Alaska, are considering inviting the
private sector to build and operate
highways and bridges. In all, more than
20 states have passed legislation
allowing so-called public-private
partnerships to lease and operate toll
roads.
The Indiana deal inked by Gov. Mitch
Daniels will yield hundreds of millions
of dollars in tax breaks for the
consortium, which also receives immunity
from most local and state taxes. Under
the deal, the consortium collects all
the tolls, which it's allowed to raise
to levels far beyond what Hoosiers have
been used to.
In fact, one analysis found that if
the toll regime in place in Indiana and
Chicago had been applied to New York's
Holland Tunnel for the past 70 years,
the toll could stand at $185 rather than
the current $6. Another analysis found
that the value of the road over the
75-year term could be as much as $11.38
billion -- a nice return on
MIG-Cintra's
investment, but a potential net loss of
more than $7 billion to Indiana
taxpayers.
For companies seeking to buy up
American infrastructure, the financial
stakes in privatizing the nation's
transportation arteries are potentially
huge. In 1956, a Republican president,
Dwight Eisenhower, convinced Congress
that an integrated, public highway
system was vital to economic
development, commerce and even national
security. Today, Ike's legacy is at a
crossroads.
The federal highway trust fund,
financed by the proceeds of the federal
gas tax, is running out of money, in
part because lawmakers have not dared to
raise the tax since the mid-'90s. At
this rate, the fund will be in the red
by 2009. Meanwhile, states and cities
desperate for repairs to decaying roads
and bridges, not to mention new
highways, are struggling to find ways to
pay for transportation projects.
Enter privatization, which promises a
quick fix -- and a means to outsource
difficult political decisions, like
raising tolls or taxes, to entities that
don't have to worry about getting
re-elected. The notion has the
enthusiastic backing of the Bush
administration, but some politicians are
worried that, as Rep. Peter DeFazio,
D-Ore., put it during a congressional
hearing on highway privatization last
May, we are "outsourcing political will
to a private entity."
"It's a scam, basically," DeFazio,
the incoming chair of the House
Subcommittee on Highways, Transit and
Pipelines, later said in an interview.
"It just does not make sense for an
integrated national transportation
system."
With the highway trust fund headed
toward running on empty, it's clear that
new transportation funding options are
needed. But before the nation heads
further down the privatization road,
there needs to be a national dialogue --
and not just among the nation's
investment bankers.
Schulman is Mother
Jones' Washington, D.C.-based Lannan
Investigative Fellow. This op-ed was
adapted from a longer version in the
magazine. American Forum.