With A
Senate Vote of
30 to 0,
The
House Voted To
Pass SB792, 127 To 19
CorridorWatch
co-founders
David and Linda
Stall were
in the gallery watching
as the House
voted 127 ayes to 19
nays
in favor of
passing
SB792 as
reported from
the Conference
Committee. The
entire process
took 15 minutes.
With a very
short period of
time the bill
was officially
signed in the
House and
Senate. Next
stop, the
Governor's desk
and very soon
too.
Before the vote
was taken several
Representatives
came to the back
microphone and asked questions
of bill sponsor Representative
Wayne
Smith Those
questions were
designed to get the
full
legislative
intent of
SB792
on the record.
Those asking
clarifying
questions (in
order) were
Reps. Leibowitz,
Kolkhorst,
Macias, Bolton,
and Noriega.
Rep. Liebowitz
wanted
clarification
that despite
Loop 1604 having
been taken out
from under the
moratorium that
it was still a
joint project
with SH281 and
as they could
not move
forward. Smith
agreed.
Rep. Kolkhorst
wanted agreement
that Smith
understood as
she did that
Kenneth
Armbrister and
Kris Heckmann of
the Governor's
office
represented that
excluding the
term 'facility
agreement' did
not mean the
moratorium did
not apply to
TTC-35
components and
that no
construction
agreement for
any segment of
TTC-35
(excluding Loop
9) would be
entered into
during the two
years. Smith
agreed that was
the
understanding.
Rep. Macias
asked for
agreement that
provisions of
SB792 only
required market
valuation to be
used for two
specific
projects and
that otherwise
market valuation
could not be
used without
local agreement.
Smith agreed.
Rep. Bolton
wanted agreement
that the Central
Texas Regional
Mobility
Authority (CTRMA)
cannot enter
into a market
valuation
project without
the agreement of
the Capitol Area
Metropolitan
Planning
Organization
(CAMPO). Smith
agreed that
agreement by
CAMPO would be
required.
Rep. Noriega
asked for a
clarification
related to
specific Harris
County projects.
Smith agreed
with his
understanding.
No
one spoke in
opposition to
adoption before
the question was
called and a
record vote was
taken at 1:29
p.m. with 127
voting aye and
19 voting nay.
Representatives
that voted
against SB792:
Burnam, Castro,
Coleman, Farias,
Farrar, Frost,
Hernandez,
Laubenberg,
Leibowitz,
Macias, Martinez
Fischer,
McClendon,
Miller, Paxton,
Puente, Straus,
Thompson, Veasey,
and Villarreal.
Rep. Smith told House
members that the
Governor's
Office had a
staff member standing
by to accept the delivery of
SB792. Already
today
SB792 was
delivered to the
Governor's
office and
officially
received. Bill
negotiators were
told that the
Governor would sign
the bill
before Monday.
Despite Loss of
Amendment 13
CorridorWatch
Backed SB792
The valiant
effort of
Representative
Lois Kolkhorst
together with
dozens of other
legislators,
thousands of
CorridorWatch
members, and the
thousands more
who joined us
could not over
come the
tremendous power
of the
Governor's
office to kill
amendment 13. Those
who fought this
fight with us
deserve our
gratitude.
Congratulations!
Your calls,
faxes and email
generated the
support
necessary to
produce a
bill that's a
giant leap
forward in our
fight to stop
the Trans Texas
Corridor.
Without your
support our
effort would
have been
completely
crushed by a
Governor who is
determined to
build the TTC
over the
objections of
Texas citizens,
community
leaders, and the
entire Texas
Legislature.
Your pressure
for Amendment 13
produced
tangible results
that will become
powerful tools
in our continued
fight against
the TTC.
We will get a
moratorium.
Although it's
punched full of
holes to
accommodate a
dozen pending
toll road
project across
the state,
SB792
still contains a
two-year
moratorium that
will slow
construction of
the Trans Texas
Corridor,
particularly
TTC-69. While we
remain
uncertain that
the moratorium
language of
SB792
is tight
enough to stop
TTC-35 facility
agreements from
being executed
during the next
two-years.
However,
we have been
given that
assurance from
others who are
very involved in
the process,
including
Senator Nichols.
It has also been put
on the official
record over and over
that it is the
intent of the
legislature to halt
any TTC construction
contract from being
signed over the next
two years, including
TTC-35. In response,
public
representations have
been made to the
legislature that no
TTC construction
contracts will be
executed during the
moratorium. Should
that occur a certain
firestorm will erupt
with CorridorWatch
leading a charge
against TxDOT.
Here are some of the
other positive things that
Senate Bill 792 will
do for Texas:
[citation]
SB792
requires
comprehensive
development
agreements (CDA) to
come under
review and
reauthorization.
This 'sunset
provision' will
effect all CDAs
including all of
TTC-35 and
TTC-69.
This provides
another
opportunity to
stop or limit the use of CDAs
after 2009.
[citation]
SB792 limits CDA
agreements to 50
years, including
toll road
agreements which
had been
previously
authorized to
extend to 70
years.
[citation]
SB792
provides
greater
public access to
information and
more disclosure
with regard to
the Trans Texas
Corridor and
other toll
related
contracts and
details.
[citation]
SB792
invalidates
the TxDOT north
Texas 'protocol'
that had the
effect of
limiting the
number of
projects that
public
authorities
could
participate in
opening the door
for PPP
agreements.
[citation]
SB792
places
some
restrictions on
financial
advisers working
both sides of
PPP deals.
[citation]
SB792
prohibits
non-compete
clauses that
limit or stop
construction,
reconstruction,
expansion,
rehabilitation,
operation, or
maintenance of a
highway -
anywhere.
[citation]
SB792
prohibits
compete
penalties or
compensation
payment
agreements for a
wide range of
highway
projects. This
will includes
SH121 and any
other private
toll road
agreement that
is not already
signed.
[citation]
SB792
limits
compete
penalties or
compensation
from extending
to competing
projects more
than four miles
either side of a
CDA project.
This will
includes SH121
and any other
private toll
road agreement
that is not
already signed.
[citation]
SB792 requires
that any compete
penalties
resulting from a
PPP deal
approved by a
county will come
out of that
district's
funding, thereby
creating a local
incentive
against bad
deals.
[citation]
SB792 reduces
the potential of
excessive buyout
penalties by
preventing the
use of future
revenue
projections that
were not part of
the original
deal.
[citation]
SB792 requires
the state
auditor to
verify the
traffic and
revenue
estimates of
concessions.
[citation]
SB792 requires
members of a RMA
created by a
city
to be residents
of Texas.
[citation]
SB792 prohibits
gifts to toll
authority
directors.
[citation]
We had none of these
protections before
SB792; and, no
chance to get any of
them without
SB792.
Market
Valuation
provisions will
not circumvent
NEPA regulation
and process.
It is true that
a project
without federal
funds is not
required to
comply with NEPA
regulations.
However, any
amount of
federal funds
used will
trigger the NEPA
requirements.
TxDOT commingles
their state and
federal funds
thereby tainting
all TxDOT funds.
If any TxDOT
funds are used
they are
therefore
presumed to
include federal
funds. That's an
action they have
expressed regret
with from
time-to-time but
have been unable
to resolve.
Presently it is
difficult to
envision any
project that
could be
initiated
without the use
of TxDOT staff
or planning
(both require
funding even if
contracted).
Projects like,
Loop 1604,
SH281, TTC-35,
and TTC-69 have
long ago past
the threshold of
federal fund use
and are forever
required to
comply with NEPA.
"New" funds for
those projects
do not create
any exceptions,
once under NEPA
forever under
NEPA.
We cannot see
market valuation
having any
unique impact on
NEPA compliance.
Even without
Amendment 13
there's enough
in SB792 to
merit our full
support.
Our legislators
listened, heard
us, and did
their best to
deliver a TTC
moratorium. It's
not a perfect
bill, they
seldom are. And
yes, there are
several
provisions that
we don't like
and would like
to see removed.
But that time is
gone and we'll
need to wait
until next
session to
address them.