Bill
to Hold Comprehensive
Development Agreements for
2-Years Can Stop the
Trans Texas Corridor
Passing this bill will provide enough
time to expose the bad public policy of
the TTC and high-cost and adverse impact
of public-private toll roads.
The public-private deals negotiated by
TxDOT and the Transportation Commission
behind closed doors are not in the best
interest of any region of Texas. Whether
it's TTC-35 or SH-121, these projects
will have long-term costs to our State
and citizens that cannot be fully
calculated from the information
available today.
Regions like DFW should not be
coerced into a bad deal because it looks
like the only deal. It's not.
Enormous financial decisions are being
made in the rush to cash in on
public-private partnership development
agreements; and, it's happening without
adequate information, disclosure,
debate, analysis, study or review. The
immediate benefits are attractive but
the long-term risks and liabilities are
virtually unknown.
The people of Texas are at tremendous
risk. Regardless of the source of funds,
the entire cost including design,
construction, maintenance, operation,
financing, and return on investment will
be paid almost exclusively by Texas
consumers.
Franchise fees collected by the
concessionaire and passed back to
the State will become a new Shadow Tax.
Average and low income motorists may be
unable to afford tolls. The cost of
goods, services and utilities will
increase to everyone as tolls and fees
are passed along to the consumer. By
design free alternatives will remain
choked with the congestion necessary to
ensure profitable toll roads, or we will
be forced to pay the toll road operator
for the privilege of building additional
free road capacity or other competing
transportation systems.
It's difficult to see what risk our
private will assume since they will pick
only the most profitable routes, control
every aspect of development, set tolls
at whatever level they desire, own all
toll revenue, use the state to collect
their tolls, have the tax advantages of
ownership, adjust payment to the state
downward for variables such as
inflation, and even increased
construction costs. Plus they will be
compensated for revenue losses created
by new or expanded highways that
adversely effect their for-profit road.
TxDOT assures us that the pending TTC-35
agreement will not interfere with the
20-year expansion plan for I-35. The
fact is I-35's improvement plan is
insufficient on its face or we would not
need the additional capacity and
accelerated construction schedule
promised by TTC-35.
If traffic volumes continue to increase
at the rates projected, we will find
that on whatever day the 20-year plan is
completed we will still need greater
capacity.
If so, we will find ourselves bound by
30 or more years of competitive
restrictions that limit our ability to
expand highways within the corridor
zone. Such restriction is particularly
ominous because, as TxDOT touts, 45% of
the state's population lives with that
zone.
If highway construction costs are
prohibitively high today, what's the
impact of adding a non-compete penalty
cost to the acquisition and construction
cost of every future project?
Don't count on a buyout provision to
provide meaningful protection. Under the
current scheme the cost of buying out
any element of the TTC will be
unimaginably unaffordable.
We are on the verge of
relinquishing control of vital public
infrastructure in ways that cannot be
fully appreciated today.
Transportation has changed dramatically
over the last 50 years and will
certainly change dramatically over the
next 50.
Imagine having a state transportation
system today that is still limited for
two more years by the restrictions,
terms and conditions of a CDA that was
signed in 1959.
I hope that we can stop and give proper
consideration to these CDAs now so that
Texas does not have to wait for the
106th Legislature in 2058 to correct the
bad deals we initiate during the next
two years.
- David Stall, CorridorWatch.org