|
Challenging the Wisdom of the Trans Texas Corridor.
|
|
Research Resources |
[ HOME ]
INDEX: Articles by Date
"This is highway robbery, and we
should not pursue this project"
Nearly everyone who spoke
publicly Wednesday were in favor of the no-action alternative.
|
Residents warn
of toll from planned highway
By JIMMY ISAAC,
Longview News-Journal
Not one of the 11 East Texans who approached the podium at
Wednesday's hearing on Interstate 69 voiced support for the
planned highway.
"This is highway robbery, and we
should not pursue this project," said David Simpson, a Longview
resident and fifth-generation Texan. "This process has bypassed
the Constitution. It has bypassed the U.S. Congress, and I'm
opposed to it because of the unconstitutional way that it has
been pushed through."
The public hearing, held at Maude Cobb Convention and Activity
Center, was a chance for residents to comment and ask questions
about Interstate 69/Trans-Texas Corridor. The corridor would
extend about 650 miles from Laredo to Victoria to Houston's
north and west suburbs. It would then travel through East Texas
to Texarkana parallel to the U.S. 59 route, according to
environmental impact studies released in December.
The corridor is a collection of passenger and freight highway
lanes, utility and rail lines and pipelines. Its width could
reach 1,200 feet — more than three football fields from end zone
to end zone.
The Texas Department of Transportation is holding 47 public
hearings in three weeks along the corridor route. TxDOT Tyler
District held Wednesday's hearing in Longview because U.S. 59
touches the southeastern tip of Rusk County, according to TxDOT
spokesman Larry Krantz.
About 105 residents attended Wednesday's meeting, Krantz said.
Would-be participants had three options for communication: speak
at the microphone, speak in private with a court reporter or
write their comments. Comments are being accepted until March
19. After that, substantive comments will be addressed in the
Final Environmental Impact Statement. The Federal Highway
Administration then will announce whether it has selected the
recommended corridor route, selected an alternative route or
taken no action — an alternative that would mean that no
location for the corridor has been identified.
Nearly everyone who spoke
publicly Wednesday were in favor of the no-action alternative.
Some East Texans dressed the part. Nancy Falster, a Winnsboro
farm owner, wore a prison outfit to depict that she and other
Texans were becoming prisoners because of the corridor.
"Trans-Texas Corridor 69 will
not only break us financially but shackle the future generations
if this plan goes through," she said. "We already pay for the
roads by taxes. What else will we be paying in the future?"
At least one person who attended the Longview hearing was not
opposed to Interstate 69/Trans-Texas Corridor. Longview District
2 Councilman Daryl Williams, who did not speak in public
comment, said the planned corridor would bring benefits to his
city.
"It really won't impact us much," he said. "I just want it west
of Marshall."
TxDOT officials were not allowed to
respond to any comments entered into record.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAIR USE NOTICE.
This document may contain copyrighted material whose use has not
been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
CorridorWatch.org is making this article available for academic research purposes in our non-commercial,
non-profit, effort to advance the
understanding of government accountability, civil liberties, citizen
rights, social and environmental justice issues. We believe that
this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as
provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish
to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner. CorridorWatch.org does not express or imply that
CorridorWatch.org holds any claim of copyright on such material as
may appear on this page. |
This Page Last
Updated:
Thursday June 12, 2008 |