No public support for corridor
January 25, 2008
By
Stephen Palkot, Fort Bend Herald
Leaders with the
Texas Department of Transportation
sought to allay fears about the
Trans-Texas Corridor Thursday night in
Rosenberg with a “town hall” meeting.
The meeting proceeded fairly smoothly,
but hardly seemed to put a dent in the
large crowd's seemingly uniform
opposition to the proposal of a massive
transportation corridor.
Hank Gilbert, a regular speaker at TTC
events and leader of an anti-TTC
non-profit group, drew cheers for
suggesting TxDOT officials have failed
to make the case for a large, privately
owned transportation cluster.
“No good argument
has been made for the TTC that would
allow farmers to be willing to give up
their land,” he said.
About 500 people filled the main hall of
the Rosenberg Civic and Convention
Center, many wearing anti-TTC stickers
and buttons distributed that night. Not
one member of the public expressed any
support for the corridor, which has been
heavily pushed by Gov. Rick Perry.
An artist's rendering of the corridor,
displayed widely by TxDOT in 2005,
showed dedicated car and truck lanes
running side-by-side with rail tracks
and utility lines, in what
transportation planners said could be a
1,200-foot wide corridor. Steve Simmons,
deputy executive director of TxDOT, said
Thursday night that image was
misleading, and said displaying it was a
mistake.
Simmons said rather than the TTC being a
“megahighway,” it is really a “delivery
method” for resources to fund the
various modes of transportation that
could be implemented along the
corridor's route.
The TTC proposal
centers around the idea that private
companies would fund and build
transportation corridors at their own
cost, rather than through taxpayer
money. Those companies, in turn, would
recoup their investment through tolls
and other charges related to the
corridor.
Ned Holmes, a member of TxDOT's
commission, said he would prefer to see
the road owned by the state through
traditional funding means, but argued
the state does not have the money.
Simmons said federal funding for
highways is being cut drastically, TxDOT
cannot take out bonds for large-scale
transportation upgrades and has no
ability to fund rail expansion, so the
TTC is a “tool” for getting the
infrastructure built.
“We can only work with the tools the
Legislature gives us, and they gave us
the tools to look at these
public/private partnerships,” said
Simmons.
Motives questioned
Speakers, some of whom were travelling
the state to attend the town hall
meetings, several times questioned TxDOT
on the motivation behind TTC, arguing it
stems purely from international trade
agreements like NAFTA.
Simmons said Texas now has 24 million
residents, and currently experiences the
most growth of any state in the U.S.
“We're going to have to start looking at
how we're going to address it,” he said.
As for freight, Simmons said 80 percent
of Mexico's exported goods enter the
U.S. through Texas, and an upcoming
expansion of the Panama Canal along with
the growth of several Texas ports
creates a need for greater
transportation infrastructure.
“The first port of call after the Panama
Canal is Texas, and the studies are
showing that the population is growing
at a rate of 1,000 new people every
day,” he said.
These town hall meetings are being held
in response to wide-spread criticism of
the TTC, conceded TxDOT officials. A
round of formal public hearings is set
to take place next month, with one in
Rosenberg on Feb. 25, but transportation
officials by law will not be allowed to
answer questions or respond to comments
at those meetings.
Fort Bend County is most likely to be
affected by what is being called the
TTC/69 route, which is a merger of the
proposed I-69 route with the TTC
concept. Study maps indicate that could
run about 650 miles from the Mexican
border to Louisiana and Arkansas, mostly
replacing U.S. 59. TxDOT plans to
include a path from the main route of
the corridor to Houston area ports, and
that could run through the southern half
of Fort Bend County, according to TxDOT
maps.
The public hearing on Feb. 25 will
consist of an open house session from 5
p.m. to 6:30 p.m., followed by a chance
to speak about the TTC/69 proposal from
6:30 p.m. That meeting will also take
place at the Rosenberg Civic and
Convention Center.