|
Challenging the Wisdom of the Trans Texas Corridor.
|
|
Research Resources |
[ HOME ]
INDEX: Articles by Date
"MPs are considering an
investigation into Britain's only privately owned motorway after the cost of
driving rocketed ..." -- as MPs do, according to press reports, every time
there's a toll hike.
Too bad. The
contracts are tight as a drum. The M6, the
Toronto 407 and the San Diego 125, all controlled by Macquarie
|
Golden toll roads drive MacBank
Michael West / The Australian (Sydney, Australia)
"Cost
of M6 motorway toll soars by 50 per cent", blared the headline
in yesterday's edition of The Telegraph in Britain.
Shares in Macquarie Infrastructure Group (MIG), which owns the
road, went up despite the down day. Higher tolls equals good
news.
"MPs
are considering an investigation into Britain's only privately
owned motorway after the cost of driving rocketed ..." -- as MPs
do, according to press reports, every time there's a toll hike.
Too
bad. The contracts are tight as a drum. The M6, the Toronto 407
and the San Diego 125, all controlled by Macquarie, are the best
toll road assets in the world. And, not coincidentally, the only
unregulated ones.
The
real issues worth considering are twofold. For the consumer, are
infrastructure costs going up across the board? Airports,
toll-roads, power generation, communications towers, and the
likes of childcare and aged care assets? The list goes on.
Thankfully for local motorists, the tolls are linked to CPI and
average weekly earnings.
For
the financiers, the picture is mixed. Thanks to the credit
squeeze and deteriorating markets it would seem the jig is up
for aggressive refinancings, revaluations, and other assorted
"events" employed by the "Macquarie model" to rip out a fee.
"Deal velocity", moreover, is on the wane.
There
will be some pressure on prices for consumers. And there will be
pressure on earnings for the likes of Macquarie and Babcock. But
it's not all bad news for the money engineers. Macquarie now
banks $1 billion a year from its base fees alone. It -- the
group, not its satellites, that is -- is best placed among all
its proteges.
As
for growth, the money still pours into the pension funds -- and
these funds, leery of shares and bonds (especially exotics), are
pouring it into infrastructure. On Tuesday night, Macquarie
slapped $18 billion in equity into two funds alone -- its
European Infrastructure Fund (3) and a US fund.
But
while the inflows are there, an ominous move by New Jersey
Governor John Corzine wiped a little bit of blue sky out of the
model this week when he took the rather socialist tack (for a
former Goldman Sachs chairman) of spurning a couple of large
road privatisation deals.
Some
$US50 billion worth of roads in the New Jersey Turnpike and the
Golden State Parkway, pronounced Corzine, would now be retained
by the state. The state would raise the requisite debt against
the assets on the basis that it would levy the same debt as the
private bidders had proposed.
Ironically for the infrastructure players, though governments
will now have to cop a lower price for their asset sales, the
financiers can still get the same kind of return on equity. The
credit crisis has meant the financiers won't pay governments as
much for their assets as their gearing will be lower.
This
would be dawning on the NSW Government now, with its proposal
in-swing to sell $15 billion worth of electricity power
stations.
As
for the fall-out from the credit crisis, shares in the top
financial engineers, Macquarie and Babcock, have held up well,
perhaps a little too well in light of the clear pressure on
costs and falling deal-rates. Their satellites, where there is
more debt and more risk, have had a far rougher time. The
second-tier players though have been caned; Allco thumped to a
new low again, MFS foundering a tad, Centro unspeakable. There
will be more pain to come. Look for stocks with less governance,
less visibility, and lots of debt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAIR USE NOTICE.
This document may contain copyrighted material whose use has not
been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
CorridorWatch.org is making this article available for academic research purposes in our non-commercial,
non-profit, effort to advance the
understanding of government accountability, civil liberties, citizen
rights, social and environmental justice issues. We believe that
this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as
provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish
to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner. CorridorWatch.org does not express or imply that
CorridorWatch.org holds any claim of copyright on such material as
may appear on this page. |
This Page Last
Updated:
Thursday January 17, 2008 |