|
Challenging the Wisdom of the Trans Texas Corridor.
|
|
Research Resources |
[ HOME ]
INDEX: Articles by Date
|
Controversial
Trans-Texas Corridor Plans Forge Ahead
KLBJ Radio
Newsroom [Austin, TX]
The official memo has gone out from the state's transportation
department to two private companies to move ahead with plans to
build a highly-controversial superhighway which critics say hurt
Texas, and cause an erosion in commerce nationwide.
Plans for the Trans-Texas corridor were being formulated 16
years ago, but Governor Rick Perry's office says it "lacked the
billions of dollars in funding needed to construct it". On
Monday, two private companies were asked to submit detailed
proposals on developing and financing the project, designed to
provide a high-speed ground link between Laredo and Dallas.
Under a preferred route, running parallel to I-35 near Austin,
the route would bypass San Antonio, Austin, Waco and Dallas.
"It has no federal funding for it, and so it is up to the State
of Texas to find funding for this interstate corridor," says
Gaby Garcia, spokesperson for the Texas Department of
Transportation. "We have no money set aside for this project. No
federal funds are set aside for the interstate."
TxDOT has asked two firms, Zachry American Infrastructure, of
San Antonio; and Cintra, a Spain-based toll-road operator, to
front the project. Cintra would do business as 'Bluebonnet
Infrastructure' on this project. Cintra currently operates an
east-west toll-road in Indiana, as the result of a
highly-protested takeover in 2005, approved by Indiana's
governor at the time.
In an online fact-versus-myth page dedicated to the corridor, or
"TTC/I-69" as the state calls it, Governor Perry says the road
will be paid for entirely by private financing. When completed,
it will be a totally toll-operated highway.
"[It's] a revenue-generating opportunity for a private partner
to have a monopoly on transportation," says David Stall, of the
group 'Corridor Watch.org', based in Fayetteville, Texas. "I
mean, there's no free lunch and there's no free road. And when
you layer-in a profit for a private partner that has a monopoly
who is going to dictate the price of the infrastructure,
absolutely they're going to pay for it."
Although there have been previous newspaper articles and maps
illustrating the future main artery of the corridor paralleling
I-35 and taking about the same path as the brand-new SH130, east
of Austin (currently toll), the U.S. Route 59 was recently
asserted as the official route for the planned highway. U.S. 59
connects Laredo with roughly west of Victoria, proceeds
northeast to Houston, and roughly due north to Texarkana.
"We're concerned that this has been a project that has excluded
public input," Stall says.
Some critics have also contested the plan in saying that it
would divide some of the area's massive properties, farms and
ranches by upwards of a one-half mile. According to Governor
Perry's online "contention" versus "reality" publication, that
statement is untrue. He says access roads and overpasses would
be built in select locations to give property owners access to
their lands. Other critics claim the highway would be built
using eminent domain and the state could easily give far less
than fair market value to property owners whose land the highway
would consume for construction. The Governor claims that
assertion is untrue and that property owners have every right to
contest any offer made for their property, in court.
The state contends that the project "is needed to make
transportation safer, faster and more reliable and to provide
for better hurricane evacuation".
The entire Trans-Texas Corridor could take up to 50 years to
complete.
TxDOT has asked the two companies to submit their proposals no
later than March 5.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAIR USE NOTICE.
This document may contain copyrighted material whose use has not
been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
CorridorWatch.org is making this article available for academic research purposes in our non-commercial,
non-profit, effort to advance the
understanding of government accountability, civil liberties, citizen
rights, social and environmental justice issues. We believe that
this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as
provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish
to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner. CorridorWatch.org does not express or imply that
CorridorWatch.org holds any claim of copyright on such material as
may appear on this page. |
This Page Last
Updated:
Tuesday December 04, 2007 |