The Trans Texas Corridor
Massive road project endangers landscapes and
the environment
September 4, 2007
Environmental Defense
Even the old adage that they don't do anything small
in Texas doesn't fully capture the magnitude of the
proposed Trans Texas Corridor transportation
project.
As planned, this would be a 4,000
mile-long network of tolled auto and truck lanes,
high-speed freight and passenger rail tracks, and
right- of -way for electric power lines and gas and
water pipelines. The initial segments would run
south and north through the heart of the state.
The TTC's quarter-mile wide corridors would
parallel major Interstate highways, take 900 square
miles of land, and affect 600,000 acres of land and
water habitat. The cost estimates are a whopping
$184 billion.
The purpose of the TTC is to speed the flow of
goods from Latin America and Asia through Texas to
the Midwest, the Northeast and Canada. As such, TTC
is not designed to address Texas' own transportation
problems, which are in the metropolitan areas; TTC
would bypass major cities and rural communities.
Authority for the TTC was granted in 2002 in the
last hours of the Texas legislative session as a
300-page transportation bill was rushed through with
neither serious legislative debate nor consultation
with commissioners, local city officials or regional
planning agencies. The public and most local
officials first became aware of the project in 2005
when the Texas Department of Transportation (DOT)
held one public meeting in each of the 254 counties.
The US DOT is rushing through approvals of the
corridor's initial segments. TTC-69 from Texarkana
to Laredo is being expedited under President Bush’s
2002 Executive Order while I-35 from Dallas to
Laredo is advancing under special accelerated
project development procedures.
As public opposition to the TTC has grown over
its environmental and property impacts, it became a
major issue in the 2006 statewide elections, drawing
opposition from the Republican, Democratic,
Libertarian, and Independent Parties as well as the
Farm Bureau, the Cattle raisers, environmental
organizations, and hundreds of local city councils
and county commissioner’s courts.
In response to the popular opposition, a 2007
bill put a two year moratorium on all public private
road concession agreements and established a
legislative study group on these contracts. Texas
DOT can continue to contract for design and
financing elements of the plan and continue
environmental assessments, but cannot yet advance to
construction.
Meanwhile, the first stage environmental review
of the initial TTC corridors have looked only at
alternative corridor alignments, not considering
options for better operating and managing existing
roads and rail lines nor considering how strategic
investments might relieve bottlenecks on the
existing rail or road system, rather than creating
entirely new transportation corridors.
Environmental Defense has joined with other
groups in calling the TTC an environmental disaster.
It would destroy wildlife habitat and consume prime
farmland. In crossing Texas' major rivers, it will
harm water quality. Air quality and human health
will also be put at risk.
The TTC will bisect rural communities while
promoting greater sprawl, more miles driven, greater
dependence on imported oil, and increased greenhouse
gas emissions.
Texas DOT is proceeding with the next stages of
environmental review. As it does so, there are
opportunities to devote resources to enable local
and regional officials and stakeholders to develop a
bottoms-up vision for Texas that might better serve
community and economic development needs and greatly
reduce the environmental impacts and social costs of
building on natural, undeveloped land.