Name changed to hide 'Superhighway'?
WND obtains secret document revealing original
moniker of 'SuperCorridor'
September 2,
2007
By Jerome R. Corsi
-
WorldNetDaily.com
A 1998 document which WND has obtained shows the
North American SuperCorridor Coalition, or NASCO,
was originally named the North American Superhighway
Coalition.
The document plays into an emerging debate in
which a number of critics, including President Bush,
want to deny that a NAFTA "Superhighway" exists.
Christopher Hayes, writing in
the
Aug. 27 edition of the Nation claimed that,
"There is no such thing as a proposed NAFTA
Superhighway."
President Bush at the third summit meeting of the
Security and Prosperity Partnership of North
America in Montebello, Quebec,
on Aug. 21, answered a question from a reporter at
Fox News that NAFTA Superhighways were part of a
"conspiracy theory."
The
document involves two 1998 letters: one, a June
10, 1998, letter written to Tiffany Newsom,
executive director of NASCO, by Francisco J. Conde,
editor and publisher of the Conde Report on
U.S.-Mexico Relations; and the second, a June 10,
1998 letter written by Newsom to consultants at
David A. Dean & Associates.
Conde addresses NASCO as North America's
Superhighway Coalition and compliments Newsom and
NASCO for supporting the Interstate Highway 35
Corridor Coalition consulting team at David A. Dean
& Associates, P.C. and Dean International, Inc.
Newsom's letter notes the Transportation Equity
Act for the 21st Century, or TEA-21, was signed into
law by President Clinton June 9, 1998.
Newsom writes, "This bill contains for the first
time in history a category and funding for trade
corridors and border programs."
She continues, "The I-35 corridor is the
strongest and most organized of the corridor
initiatives so, if we play our cards right, we stand
to get a part of the $700 million."
Newsom was referring to a
section of TEA-21 devoted to a new National Corridor
Planning and Development program, identifying
highway corridors that were specifically identified
with international trade and a Coordinated Border
Infrastructure program designed "to improve the safe
and efficient movement of people and goods at or
across the U.S./Canadian and U.S./Mexican borders."
A desire to obtain funds under TEA-21's corridor
initiative may have been responsible for changing
NASCO's name from North America's Superhighway
Coalition to North America's SuperCorridor
Coalition.
Interestingly, combining "SuperCorridor" into one
word allowed preserving the correspondence required
to continue using "NASCO" as the acronym for the
newly renamed organization.
A close reading of NASCO's website shows NASCO
does not deny that a NAFTA Superhighway exists.
NASCO insists on identifying the NAFTA
Superhighway with the existing I-35, denying only
that plans exist to build a new NAFTA Superhighway.
As WND has previously reported, this point is
made clear by a sentence on the
NASCO website which states, "There are no plans
to build a new NAFTA Superhighway – it exists today
as I-35."
Yet, NASCO has repeatedly refused to repudiate
the plans of the
Texas Department of Transportation to build the
Trans-Texas Corridor as a new
four-football-fields wide superhighway corridor
parallel to the existing I-35.
An archived version of the NASCO website going back
to Oct. 24, 2005, documents that NASCO played a role
in lobbying for the creation of the National
Corridor & Planning Development program and the
Coordinated Border Infrastructure program when
TEA-21 was being passed.
"We have assisted in the lobbying effort to bring
hundreds of millions of dollars to the NASCO I-35
Corridor, resulting in High Priority Status for I-35
in 1995 under the Intermodal Surface Transportation
Efficacy Act (ISTEA)," the 2005 NASCO website noted.
"In addition, we successfully assisted in lobbying
for the creation of two new categories under the
Transportation Act of the 21st Century (TEA-21) –
the National Corridor Planning & Development Program
and the Coordinated Border Infrastructure Program."