With Financial Tactic, Corzine Would
Keep Turnpike Public, Toll Increases and All
May 30,
2007
By
KEN BELSON,
The New York Times
Who knew that the
New Jersey Turnpike,
the state’s
congested artery
that commuters love
to hate, was so
beloved?
In the
months since Gov.
Jon S. Corzine
began exploring ways
to capitalize on the
state’s assets and
pay off billions of
dollars in debt, a
coalition of
legislators,
environmentalists
and drivers have
come out against any
plan that would
include leasing the
Turnpike and the
Garden State Parkway
to private
investors.
Long before Mr.
Corzine could unveil
a proposal, these
opponents warned
that private
investors would
increase tolls to
unreasonable levels,
let the roads fall
into disrepair and
stymie any efforts
by the state to
expand its highways.
Yet Mr. Corzine,
a shrewd former
investment banker,
appears to have
found a more
palatable solution
that lets the state
raise billions of
dollars while
keeping the highways
in public hands. At
a news conference
last week, Mr.
Corzine said he and
State Treasurer
Bradley I. Abelow
were considering “an
entirely different
kind of proposal”
that involved
creating a public
benefit corporation.
One option is for
the
New Jersey Turnpike
Authority to
raise tolls and
divert only the
increased revenue to
a newly formed
public corporation,
which would then
issue bonds backed
by that money. The
amount of the bonds
would be based on
the value of the
toll increases.
Drivers would
still face toll
increases, never a
favorite with
voters. (The Parkway
fee at each
tollbooth last went
up in 1989, to 35
cents from 25 cents;
in 2003, the
Turnpike tolls went
up as much as 17
percent.) But since
the public
corporation may be
able to issue bonds
tax-free, Mr.
Corzine
theoretically could
raise about 50
percent more than
private investors.
The governor could
then use the money
to retire some of
the approximately
$30 billion in state
debt, bolster the
depleted
Transportation Trust
Fund or finance
other projects.
“There’s no
running away from
it; the state has a
serious debt
burden,” said State
Senator Raymond J.
Lesniak, a Democrat
from Union County,
who supports the
governor’s efforts.
“It’s hoped that
riders will
understand that
small toll increases
will pay off with
fiscal stability.”
Mr. Lesniak said
that over time a
public benefit
corporation could
raise as much as $15
billion; he said
that was about what
the state would
receive if private
investors leased the
toll roads. He added
that tolls could
rise with the cost
of living, making
them predictable and
incremental.
For now, the
recommendation is
still being adjusted
by a working group
appointed by the
governor. And such a
change would require
legislative
approval, and that
is not likely until
after November, when
the entire
Legislature is up
for re-election.
"Even though
we’ve spent a lot of
time on it, we’re
not naïve to think
the public, the
Legislature, the
Turnpike Authority,
the truckers are
going to leap up and
say, ‘Aha, this is
what we’ve been
waiting for,’ ” said
one administration
official who
insisted on
anonymity because
the discussions were
continuing. “We’re
trying to optimize
around a certain
number of
objectives, and it
will touch off a
debate."
Tom Vincz, a
spokesman for the
state treasurer’s
office, said, “We’re
coming close to the
finish line.”
That has not
stopped people from
choosing sides. Some
in the investment
community applaud
the governor for
being honest enough
to ask the public to
contribute by paying
higher tolls. They
also appreciate that
he has listened to
the public — which
in several polls has
rejected the idea of
leasing the toll
roads — and has
found a way to keep
them under state
control.
They added that
by considering a
public benefit
corporation, Mr.
Corzine, a former
co-chairman of
Goldman Sachs, and
Mr. Abelow, who was
a colleague at the
investment house,
might have dealt a
blow to those
advocating the
leasing of toll
roads to private
investors, as
Indiana and Chicago
have done in recent
years and
Pennsylvania is
considering.
“This will cool
enthusiasm for
private lease
deals,” said one
financial industry
adviser who instead
on anonymity because
he has to maintain
neutrality. “The
fact that Corzine
and Abelow came
around to this will
carry a lot of
weight in the
industry.”
Still, there are
plenty of skeptics
who are concerned
that the toll
increases will not
be dedicated to
improving the
state’s roads and
rails.
“People will vote
for self-taxation
when they know it
will go for light
rail or bridges,”
said Jon Orcutt,
executive director
of the Tri-State
Transportation
Campaign, a commuter
advocacy group. “But
they are wary of it
going out into the
ozone.”
As the Senate
minority leader,
Leonard Lance,
a Republican
from Hunterdon
County, put it:
“This is a proposal
that has to be
explained in great
detail to the
Legislature. Other
than paying down
state debt, I
believe we need
voter approval for
projects associated
with the money
raised.”
There are others
who say that little
would change because
the new corporation
would do what the
Turnpike Authority
is already able to
do: issue bonds
backed by revenue
from tolls.
“Unless I’m
missing anything,
the only thing that
is different here is
optics,” said John
Foote, a senior
fellow at the
Kennedy School of
Government at
Harvard University,
who focuses on
transportation
policies.
|