|
Challenging the Wisdom of the Trans Texas Corridor.
|
|
Research Resources |
[ HOME ]
INDEX: Articles by Date
|
One of the truisms
about the
Legislature is that
the game is played
in multiple arenas.
You can lose in
committee and win on
the floor; lose in
the House and win in
the Senate; win in
both houses and lose
in the governor's
office; beat the
governor and still
lose. We are about
to learn this lesson
anew on the
transportation bill.
House Bill 1892 will
not become law in
its present form.
Governor Perry will
veto the bill. He
will never accept
the primacy of the
metropolitan toll
authorities over Tx-DOT.
I believe the Senate
will fail to
override the veto.
Even if both houses
override, however,
the game is not
over. Perry will
call a special
session on
transportation. If
the Legislature
fails to send him a
bill he can live
with (which repeals
the objectionable
provisions of 1892),
he will call another
special session. And
another. This is
war. The Legislature
can avoid the
showdown by
recalling 1892, in
which case Perry
could allow the
stand-alone
moratorium to become
law. I don't believe
the Legislature has
the stomach for this
fight.
Patricia Kilday Hart said...
Paul, I agree with your
assessment that this is war --
and that it will be fought on
many fronts. Don't forget about
Steve Ogden's budget riders,
which blow up CDAs. Where will
the Senate end up on this issue?
It is completely united against
Perry, Williamson, TxDOT, et al
on the current scheme for
public-private partnerships. It
falls apart on how to correct
the problem. There will be a
strong attempt to mount a veto
override -- though the odds are
clearly in Perry's favor, since
he can start shooting hostages
(members' bills) until he gets
11 votes to block an override
attempt. He'll start with the 10
members who voted against
considering Florence Shapiro's
CDA bill (Averitt, Duncan,
Fraser, Hinojosa, Lucio,
Nichols, Ogden, Seliger,Uresti
and Zaffirini). On the other
hand, I would not underestimate
the strong anti-Perry sentiment
in the Senate. Perry's comments
yesterday about taxpayers being
left out of this session's work
only fueled the urge (which has
existed since the HPV order) to
poke a thumb in the governor's
eye. There are many members
--probably a majority -- who
think raising the gas tax is
preferable to 50-year toll roads
that postpone the financial pain
to drivers not yet born. His
comments that the Legislature
has not taken care of taxpayers
did not help his public
relations problem in the Senate.
As I mentioned in a previous
post, Texas lawmakers get pretty
emotional on the issue of
concrete. I'm not sure that
lawmakers wouldn't welcome a
special session if they thought
they could regain control of
TxDOT. Cancel your June plans.
Paul Burka said...
Bubba Galt believes that I
have been used. Anonymous thinks
that I am making something up
out of thin air. To Bubba I say,
I don't mind being used to
convey information as long as I
believe that the information is
accurate. To anonymous I say, I
value being right too much to
make things up. Do I have a hard
and fast statement from the
governor that he will veto the
bill? No. Do I have a good
reason to believe, after having
talked to folks close to the
governor, that he will veto the
bill? Yes. Can I make a judgment
about what the governor might do
based upon my years of knowing
him? I think so. On most policy
issues, Perry does not really
get engaged. But he has been
fully engaged in transportation
from the start of his
governorship, and he thinks his
policy is right, and he will not
give in. If he keeps calling the
Legislature into special
session, eventually the
Legislature will have to give
in. This time they won't go to
Ardmore. I-35 is too crowded.
One more thing. Anonymous, if
you want to believe that the
Legislature is not allowed
itself to be bullied, how many
years have you been watching
Texas politics? Talk is cheap in
this world. They'll crumple like
tinfoil before August.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAIR USE NOTICE.
This document may contain copyrighted material whose use has not
been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
CorridorWatch.org is making this article available for academic research purposes in our non-commercial,
non-profit, effort to advance the
understanding of government accountability, civil liberties, citizen
rights, social and environmental justice issues. We believe that
this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as
provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish
to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner. CorridorWatch.org does not express or imply that
CorridorWatch.org holds any claim of copyright on such material as
may appear on this page. |
This Page Last
Updated:
Thursday May 03, 2007 |