Lawmakers have a busy month ahead
April 29, 2007
By JOHN MORITZ,
Star-Telegram staff writer
AUSTIN -- As the 2007 legislative
session heads into its final four weeks,
lawmakers have yet to adopt a budget for
the upcoming two-year spending cycle,
and they're still hammering out the
details on how to fix the
scandal-plagued Texas Youth Commission.
Does that mean that lawmakers have
been dithering away their time for the
past 130 days or so, and that the
state's crucial needs will go
unaddressed?
Not really.
A lot of legislation is queued up in
the Capitol's pipeline, and lawmakers
and their staffs are gearing up for the
monthlong stretch when the majority of
the most pressing initiatives will
emerge from committee and go to the
floors of both chambers for a vote.
Here are some key questions about
what lawmakers have done, and which
measures are likely to advance and which
ones might die before the session ends
May 28:
Question: Will the
long-neglected state parks system gets
the funding it was promised during last
year's election campaigns?
Answer: The
prospects don't look good. The $85
million a year funding increase proposed
by a special task force is not included
in either the House or Senate version of
the 2008-09 budget . But park advocates
hope it will be included before the
budget is finalized in mid- to late May.
Q: Will all of the
legislative maneuvering regarding the
proposed sale of TXU and other utility
matters result in lower prices or more
reliable electric service for consumers?
A: While there is a
proposal that would cut some of the
highest electric rates in Texas by 15
percent, consumer groups warn that the
proposed sale of TXU will probably lead
to higher rates in the long term. Rep.
Phil King, R-Weatherford, chairman of
the powerful House Regulated Industries
Committee, has sided with utilities and
opposed giving regulators oversight
authority for the sale.
Q: In recent years,
schools and education issues seemed to
dominate Austin's agenda. Not so this
year. Why not?
A: Last year
lawmakers overhauled the way Texas pays
for public education, which got the
state out from under the threat of a
court-ordered shutdown of the schools.
The plan was the culmination of about
five years' work, so lawmakers had
little appetite for additional
revisions.
Q: What are the
chances that Texas will finally legalize
casino gambling?
A: The chances
appear bleak at this stage. The only
significant gaming legislation is a
measure that would allow the three
federally recognized American Indian
tribes to operate casinos on their
lands. It might come up in the House on
Wednesday, but Senate passage is
uncertain.
Q: What's the status
of Gov. Rick Perry's order requiring
girls entering the sixth grade to be
vaccinated for the sexually transmitted
disease that causes cervical cancer?
A: Legislation that
would effectively nullify the order is
sitting on the governor's desk. He has
about a week to sign it, veto it or
allow it to become law without his
signature. If he vetoes it, there are
more than enough votes in both houses to
override the veto.
Q: Hasn't the
governor taken some other lumps this
year?
A: Some legislative
leaders faulted him for what they said
was a slow response to reports that some
Texas Youth Commission staffers were
sexually abusing inmates. He finally
agreed to put the agency under the
direction of an independent overseer,
but only after the Legislature forced
his hand. Lawmakers are also pushing
legislation that would put the brakes on
parts of Perry's plans for the
Trans-Texas Corridor by placing a
two-year moratorium on new private toll
roads. And he took heat for his support
of new coal-fired power plants and was
left holding the bag when those plans
were effectively shelved by the power
companies.
Q: Has Perry had any
successes?
A: He'll likely get
the $100 million he asked for to help
secure the border with Mexico, and
legislative leaders seem to be heeding
his warning not to pass harsh
anti-immigrant legislation.
Q: What happened to
all the talk that lawmakers would crack
down on illegal immigration?
A: The effort lost
much of its steam when state Attorney
General Greg Abbott advised the
Legislature that it might be encroaching
on the responsibility of the federal
government.
Q: What about the
effort to require elderly drivers to
retake driving tests when they renew
their licenses?
A: A bill requiring
vision exams every two years after
drivers turn 85 has passed both houses
and is awaiting Perry's signature.