Texas' new bill also lets local agencies compete for these multibillion-dollar deals, the aide said.

Any new deals were limited to 40 years instead of the 100-year period sought by the Texas Department of Transportation, Polunsky said. Other measures will make any new deals' terms more transparent, he added.

A spokesman for Republican Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who opposes the moratorium, was not available to say whether he will veto it or offer further details about his statement.

Saying it failed to "address the serious concerns raised by the Federal Highway Administration earlier this week," he added:

"I will review this bill carefully because we cannot have public policy in this state that shuts down road construction, kills jobs, harms air quality, prevents access to federal highway dollars and creates an environment within local government that is ripe for corruption." 

Polunsky said the bill was approved by a veto-proof majority.

LEASING NOT YET THE NORM HERE

Though road privatization's are common in Europe and Latin America, they have not gained much traction yet in the United States.

Two years ago, Chicago got $1.83 billion for leasing its Skyway commuter bridge, which caught the attention of cities and states around the nation as well as investment banks eager to earn rich underwriting fees.

But fiscal monitors have criticized Chicago's deal with MIG, run by Australian bank Macquarie Bank Ltd. and Cintra, part of Spain's Ferrovial. The 99-year pact failed to give taxpayers the extra toll revenue the companies can get, according to Fitch Ratings.

The Texas moratorium follows Perry's selection of Cintra in February for a $5 billion deal to overhaul State Highway 121, which runs through the road-hungry Fort Worth-Dallas area.

Lawmakers questioned the deal's 50-year term, non-compete clauses and other aspects. The local North Texas Tollway Authority said it could pay the state $2.3 billion in lease payments -- much more than the $700 million Cintra will pay.

The authority later got the go-ahead to draft a competing proposal.

The Texas bill will not affect some projects, in Harris and Tarrant Counties, for example, which say they are starved for transportation dollars, Polunsky said. Other projects in San Antonio and El Paso also will not be affected, he added.

FAIR USE NOTICE. This document may contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. CorridorWatch.org is making this article available for academic research purposes in our non-commercial, non-profit, effort to advance the understanding of government accountability, civil liberties, citizen rights, social and environmental justice issues. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. CorridorWatch.org does not express or imply that CorridorWatch.org holds any claim of copyright on such material as may appear on this page.