Toll road bids
running out of fuel
04/12/2007
Gary Scharrer,
Austin Bureau, SAN ANTONIO EXPRESS-NEWS
AUSTIN — Public wrath over private company toll
roads has soured most Texas lawmakers on a 2003
law that started the controversy, but some of
their leaders say they can't support a
moratorium on it — at least not yet.
As they jockeyed over whether and how to slow
down toll-road privatization, the state's first
private toll highway contract, to build toll
lanes between Austin and Seguin, was quietly
signed just one day after a Senate panel held
the only hearing so far on a moratorium bill.
The bill, which would put decisions on future
contracts on hold for two years, is expected to
pass out of a Senate committee this week but
stay parked on the back burner as a last-resort
measure while lawmakers look for compromise in
the final two months of the session.
Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst has directed Senate
Transportation and Homeland Security Committee
Chairman John Carona to allow the panel to
approve the bill, despite Carona's discomfort
with it.
"I think a moratorium ought to be a last
resort rather than a first response and, while I
support a moratorium as a last resort, I believe
it's much too early in the session," Carona,
R-Dallas, said.
The veteran legislator said he has assurances
that Dewhurst will give him time to try to draft
legislation that calms the outrage over proposed
50-year state contracts with private companies
to build and operate toll roads.
Critics are howling at contract
provisions that restrict
competing highways near the toll
roads and contain prohibitive
terms for buying back the roads
in the future.
They say the specter of high
toll rates combined with a loss
of control over Texas highways
has inspired broad, bipartisan
support for a moratorium.
Sen. Robert Nichols,
R-Jacksonville, has 27 of 31
senators backing his moratorium
bill. On the House side, 111 of
150 members have signed up for
Rep. Lois Kolkhorst's bill.
"It boils down to whether the
10th largest economy in the
world (Texas) can build its own
highways or if we're going to
give private equities the chance
to take all the profits from
Texas," Kolkhorst, R-Brenham,
said.
Investors will net a
projected $300 billion over the
next 50 years for private
company toll roads in major
cities along the Interstate 35
corridor, Kolkhorst said.
"The real question is, do you
want that $300 million just on
one highway to be plowed into
more highways in Texas, or do
you want that $300 million to go
to Wall Street and Spain? That's
what it boils down to," she
said. "That's a clear policy
question."
Debate heating
Many lawmakers likely will defer
to Nichols, who spent eight
years on the Texas
Transportation Commission before
becoming a senator. He expects a
moratorium to pass.
"We need to call a time-out.
We need to fix this problem, and
we need to fix it right,"
Nichols said. "The current plan
removes the control of your
future transportation system out
of your own hands. It sells the
future revenues at a discount,
and it's designed to extract
exorbitant toll rates."
Dewhurst called those rates
"astronomical" but declined to
discuss them because of
confidentiality agreements with
the private companies.
Decisions about the state's
future highway system will be
dictated by corporations instead
of Texans unless lawmakers
intervene now, Nichols said.
But Carona and House
Transportation Chairman Mike
Krusee, R-Taylor, are urging
caution. Political dissent will
scare off investors and increase
the state's financing costs for
building roads, they warn.
Texas is short "tens of
billions of dollars" needed to
build highways, Krusee said.
Publicly run regional toll
authorities can build some of
the roads but lack necessary
bonding authority to build all
of them, he said.
"Once we tell the capital
market that Texas is closed for
two years, will they ever want
to come back? Because it's very
expensive to make proposals," he
said. "The capital market looks
for willing partners and if
Texas is not a willing partner,
they leave."
A moratorium is shortsighted
because it simply postpones a
solution for two years, Carona
said.
"What we need to focus on is
a bill that takes care of the
problems and allows us to meet
our transportation needs," he
said. "A moratorium stops the
process, but no part of that
bill addresses how you will fix
the problem."
Carona also favors indexing
the state's gasoline tax to keep
pace with inflation. The state's
20-cent per gallon tax has not
increased since 1991.
Texas' ongoing population
boom requires "a massive road
building project today — not two
years from now," he said.
Done deal
The concession-development
agreement to extend Texas 130
from south of Austin to Seguin
was widely trumpeted last summer
when the state and a group led
by the Spanish firm Cintra and
Zachry Construction Corp. of San
Antonio settled on terms.
But not a peep was made when
officials signed the contract
March 22 at the Texas Department
of Transportation office in
Austin, across the street from
the Capitol.
"We made an announcement in
June, when we made a tough
decision to do it," said Ric
Williamson, chairman of the
Texas Transportation Commission.
Awarding Cintra the
construction fulfills a contract
guaranteeing the firm at least
one segment of the project,
Kolkhorst said.
Cintra-Zachry will pay to
build and operate the 40-mile,
four-lane tollway and has
pledged to give the state $25
million in up-front cash and a
share of profits. The road could
open in 2012, with toll fees set
at about 15 cents a mile in
today's dollars and increasing
with annual growth of state
domestic product.
But Kolkhorst said it's
costing Texas $19 million in
environmental and legal fees to
get the $25 million, "so we're
really not even going to net
anything on that one."
Up next is a concession to
make Texas 121 north of Dallas
into a toll road, another Cintra
project that has created an even
bigger uproar. An agreement was
unveiled in February and could
be signed within three months,
said José Lopez, a Cintra
director in Austin.
"We would be very happy to
sign tomorrow," Lopez said.
The North Texas Tollway
Authority, which had agreed not
to bid on the project, said it
could have matched Cintra's
upfront carrot of $2.1 billion
and that for the rest of the
50-year contract they could have
paid $4.2 billion compared to
Cintra's $700 million.
Motorists will pay the $3.5
billion difference if the deal
is signed, officials say.
In San Antonio, Cintra-Zachry
is competing with a consortium
headed by Macquarie of Australia
to develop and operate toll
lanes on 47 miles of U.S. 281
and Loop 1604 on the city's
North Side. That contract could
be signed as early as next year.
A moratorium on concession
contracts could stall that work
for a year or two.
"A lot of it depends on what
the language actually says,"
said Clay Smith, a TxDOT
engineer in San Antonio.
When Cintra-Zachry submitted
a proposal in 2005 for the $2.2
billion project, about $630
million in public money was
freed up for other uses. If
environmental studies get
federal clearance this summer,
construction could start next
year and finish by 2012.
San Antonio lawmakers say
they're hearing plenty of
complaints about toll roads from
Bexar County residents.
"A lot of it is because of
the lack of information," Sen.
Carlos Uresti, D-San Antonio,
said.
Sen. Jeff Wentworth, R-San
Antonio, who supports a
moratorium, emphasized that a
two-year cooling off period
would not affect toll roads
built by public toll road
authorities.
"We have to continue building
highways. The people are coming
whether we like it or not,"
Wentworth said, noting it took
Texas hundreds of years to reach
a population of 23 million but
its population is expected to
double over the next 30 years.
Carona can't promise that a
consensus will emerge from
negotiations on SB 1267, the
moratorium bill, but he
complimented Krusee and TxDOT
officials for showing good-faith
efforts to resolve nagging
worries about long-term private
toll road projects.
The moratorium option
hovering over negotiations will
help that process, he said.