Leased to the highest bidder!
April 1, 2007
By Stephanie Johnston,
Editor in Chief / PUBLIC WORKS MAGAZINE
Macquarie Infrastructure Group, the
Australian toll road operator that in 2005
signed a 99-year agreement to operate the
Chicago Skyway, is exploring similar
arrangements elsewhere in the country,
including the Pennsylvania Turnpike and the
Chesapeake Expressway in Virginia. Chicago
picked up almost $2 billion for the deal.
Not long afterward, Indiana leased its
portion of the toll road that connects to
the Skyway to Macquarie (which, as part of
the $3.85 billion deal, also is going to
help build Indiana's newest toll road).
If,
as Macquarie contends, infrastructure is a
new asset class, the firm is perfectly
positioned to profit from it. Australia has
privatized roads (and airports) and, since
Europe doesn't have highway trust funds and
gas taxes go to general funds, France,
Italy, Spain, and Portugal awarded long-term
franchises to private firms (including
Macquarie) to build and operate roads after
World War II.
Still, according to Macquarie's Web site,
there are few firms playing in the toll-road
market, and Macquarie's reaping the rewards:
Since listing on the Australian stock market
in 1996, the Macquarie Infrastructure Group
returned a compound annual return of 19.4%
in November 2004.
Here's what I don't get, though. Why aren't
U.S. banks and investment firms taking
advantage of this opportunity to expand
their offerings?
Sure, diversified mutual funds include bonds
as well as stocks, but those bonds represent
new infrastructure construction. Why haven't
we gotten past that model to cash in on what
overseas banks believe is so obvious: In the
United States, the supply of new roads can't
keep up with demand. With demand continuing
to rise (Macquarie posts quarterly traffic
reports to prove the accuracy of this
investment assumption) and drivers willing
(or forced) to use certain roads, toll roads
represent a never-ending supply of cash.
Operating costs for “well-managed toll
roads” are relatively low (20% of revenue or
less). Voila: the recipe for a long-term
low-risk investment.
We've seen this before: foreign companies
relieving us of the nasty business of
raising rates or taxes to fund public
services like drinking water and wastewater
treatment. If operating our infrastructure
is so profitable, why aren't we making—and
keeping—that money for ourselves? It can and
is being done: The Illinois State Toll
Highway Authority has been self-sustaining
since its formation in 1953.
If
you think privatization applies only to
infrastructure that's generating revenue
right now, you're forgetting how quickly
technology moves. Witness the development of
open-road tolling. By the time Macquarie's
lease with Chicago is up for renewal in the
year 2104, there may be intelligent
vehicle-and-road systems capable of charging
us for the use of any and all roads. There
may come a day when we'll pay for the
privilege of driving around our own
neighborhoods. Who will own and operate that
franchise?
And
if operating public infrastructure makes
good business sense, why are we getting out
of the business?
|