Tuesday should have been a gold star day at the
House Transportation Committee, one that
would finally put the Texas Department of
Transportation and the Texas
Transportation Institute in the same room at
the same time to duel it out over the long-term
scenarios for how to pay for the cost of
highways in Texas.
Instead, a couple of lawmakers first Rep.
Linda Harper-Brown, R-Irving, and then
Sen. John Carona, R-Dallas turned
Texas Transportation Commission Chair
Ric Williamson into a human piρata in their
frustration over Texas toll roads. First,
Harper-Brown, a longtime Irving City Council
member, berated Williamson over a document
which Williamson unwisely called "foolish"
that indicated that Dallas received $4.5 billion
less over the last five years for transportation
funding than it would have under the past system
of parceling out federal funds, often referred
to as the "fair share" system.
As state Rep. Mike Krusee, R-Round
Rock, and others explained it, federal funding
has changed. Once, it was based on where the TTC
chair lived and how he could earmark funds for
his region. A Dallas chair would be named, and
funds would shift to Dallas. A Houston chair
would be named, and those funds would shift back
to Houston.
Under the new funding formula which is
intended to localize transportation
decision-making and decrease the "begging" of
regional delegations before the TTC the focus
is not how to spend available money, but how to
address the transportation plans of a particular
region, Krusee said. According to the numbers,
the biggest beneficiary of this approach has
been the Austin region.
Later, Krusee gave Carona, the chair of the
Senate Committee on Transportation & Homeland
Security, a chance to address some comments to
Williamson. Carona pressed Williamson for a
meeting this week, saying Williamson's office
said he was booked through March. Williamson,
never one to be backed into a corner, attempted
to brush off the request, saying simply that
he'd call Carona's office to set up a time for a
meeting. It was not a meeting, Williamson said,
but simply a call to set up a meeting.
"It is this kind of lack of commitment and
artful dodging for something as basic as an
appointment to meet with you [that] causes the
hostility and the friction that exists right
now," said Carona, who has filed some distinctly
anti-toll-road legislation this session. "The
fact that you would sit there and be so arrogant
that you would not even commit to a meeting date
when I'm telling you that over the next several
days I'll be available at any time that will
work for you is very troubling."
To this, Williamson could only say, "Thank
you." When pressed again for a commitment for a
meeting, he replied, "Frankly, senator, I'm
speechless."
The confrontation was the talk around the
Capitol. Most long-term observers were
nonplussed. "There's a reason why we used to
call him Nitro Williamson," said one former
colleague-turned-lobbyist.
As to the difference between the projections
of need by TxDOT and the Texas Transportation
Institute TxDOT says the state would need a
$1.40 gas tax to cover the gap; TTI says
it would require a 10 cent gas tax increase plus
ongoing increases indexed to highway costs the
numbers are closer than they might appear on
first blush.
As both Williamson and TTI's Dennis
Christiansen pointed out, the assumptions in
the two reports are different. While both start
with the same general level of need an
additional $86 billion in new roads by 2030
TTI assumes that local jurisdictions will pick
up a third of that cost, through toll roads,
local-option gas tax, or simply general revenue
expenditures backed by property taxes. The two
reports also tinker with issues such as the fuel
efficiency of fleet vehicles and other such
numbers.
The bottom line on the TTI report projects
that the gas tax on the $56 billion in
identified needs the initial 10 cents plus
increases as needed would be about 90 cents a
gallon by 2030. The highest rate in the country
right now is 33 cents.