Williamson, Carona to
Meet
Today Following Spat
February 14,
2007
By Paul
Burka, BurkaBlog
By now, just about
everybody knows
about the
confrontation
between Senate
transportation
chairman John Carona
and Tx-DOT chairman
Ric Williamson in
the House
Transportation
committee. (Their
exchange has been
posted on
YouTube by anti-toll
activist Sal
Costello.) Carona
went to the
committee meeting in
the hope of getting
Williamson to agree
to an appointment.
Although Williamson
stonewalled in the
hearing, to his
credit, he
subsquently called
Carona and they will
meet at 3:30 this
afternoon.
Toll roads aside,
the most significant
part of the
exchange, which I
have italicized in
my transcription
below, is Carona's
challenge of
Williamson's view of
an imperial
governorship (my
description, not
Carona's).
Carona: I'm just
trying to get an
appointment with
this gentleman, and
I understand his
calendar is booked
up through March,
and I just wondered
if I could ask you,
Chairman Williamson,
if you and I could
meet sometimes this
week on important
transportation
issues.
Williamson: I'll
[pause], You are a
clever guy [general
hilarity], but I
have to be sure I
haven't worn out my
welcome.
Carona: Well, it
will go a long way
to the relationship
if I can see you
this week, at your
convenience, on
transportation
issues. There are so
many issues that
we're facing, and I
think you and I
recognize that we
have a difference of
opinion but we might
find that we have
more in common on
these issues that we
realize, but we
can't achieve any of
that unless we meet.
So I would be
grateful for the
meeting.
Williamson: I'll
look forward to
visiting with you
about this.
Carona: This week?
Williamson: Yes,
sir--
Carona: Thank you--
Williamson: Visiting
with you about the
appointment.
Carona: Oh, you mean
you can't commit?
Williamson: No, I'll
call you, I'll call
you.
Carona: Okay. Can I
expect that sometime
this week, an
appointment?
Williamson: I will
call you.
Carona: This
highlights part of
the problem right
here. You know
you mentioned that
you have one boss to
work for, but you
really don't, you
have the people of
the state to work
for, and you have
one hundred and
eighty-one members
of the Legislature
to work for,
and it is this kind
of lack of
commitment and
artful dodging for
something as basic
as an appointment to
meet with you that
causes the hostility
and the friction
that exists right
now, and I think
that's unfortunate.
It is tragic that we
have come to a day
in Texas politics,
at leasts as it
exists in
transportation
policy, that any
disagreement with
your views, and I
presume the views of
the commission,
would result in your
unwillingness to
ever meet. I would
be equally offended
if you were
unwilkling to meet
with Chairman Krusee,
but the fact that
you would sit down
there and be so
arrogant that you
would not even
commit to a meeting
date, when I'm
telling you that
over the next
several days I'll be
available at any
time that would work
for you, and I'll
tell you, it
certainly doesn't
build the kind of
relationship any of
us want to see.
Williamson: Thank
you.
Carona: So are you
refusing to make a
commitment for a
meeting this week?
Williamson: Frankly,
Senator, I'm
speechless at this
point.
(end of video)
This is the phrase
that I found
significant,
especially
considering that the
governor and the
Legislature appear
to be headed for a
major standoff over
who's the boss in
the Capitol:
Carona: You know
you mentioned that
you have one boss to
work for, but you
really don't, you
have the people of
the state to work
for, and you have
one hundred and
eighty-one members
of the Legislature
to work for....
Williamson's "one
boss to work for"
comment, referring
to the governor, was
made during the
committee hearing,
before Carona began
asking questions.
The trouble is,
Williamson is wrong.
The governor is not
the boss of the
Texas Transportation
Commission. The
governor appoints
the members of the
commission, with the
advice and consent
of the Senate. He
designates its
chairman. After
that, it is the
commission that
makes the decisions
on transportation
policy. The governor
can support
legislation, which
he has done, and he
can make requests
and give
suggestions, which
he has done, but he
has no executive
authority over
general
transportation
policy.
This is from the Tx-DOT
Web site, concerning
FAQs:
Q: What are the
commission's
responsibilities?
A: The Texas
Transportation
Commission is
responsible for:
-
planning and
making policies for
the location,
construction and
maintenance of state
highways,
-
overseeing the
design,
construction,
maintenance and
operation of the
state highway
system,
-
developing a
statewide
transportation plan
that contains all
modes of
transportation,
including highways
and turnpikes,
aviation, mass
transportation,
railroads,
high-speed railroads
and water traffic,
-
awarding contracts
for the improvement
of the state highway
system,
-
encouraging,
fostering and
assisting in the
development of
public and mass
transportation in
the state, and
-
adopting rules for
the operation of the
department.
Nowhere does it say
that the Commission
is responsible to
the
governor--because it
isn't. The
Legislature, not the
governor, has
created boards and
commissions that run
state agencies.
These boards and
commissions consist
of citizens
appointed by the
governor, and they,
along with the
Legislature, make
transportation
policy. Not the
governor. The
governor may suggest
and attempt to
persuade, but the
commission and its
chairman are free to
do what they want.
There is nothing to
prevent Williamson
from implementing
the governor's
wishes, but there is
also nothing to
prevent him from
refusing to
implement them,
should he so choose.
They are only
wishes, not
commands.
Constitutionally,
the governor is not
Williamson's boss.
The Legislature is.
Carona is right and
Williamson is wrong.
It is looking more
and more like this
session, and the
next four years,
will be dominated by
clashes between the
executive and
legislative branches
over the extent of
the powers of the
governor.