|
Challenging the Wisdom of the Trans Texas Corridor.
|
|
Research Resources |
[ HOME ]
INDEX: Articles by Date
|
Corridor finds opposition
By Patrick George,
The Daily Texan
Gov. Rick Perry has a vision, a
vision of a massive transportation
system that runs from the Mexican
border to Oklahoma. Called the
Trans-Texas Corridor, the system was
proposed in 2002 by Perry and has
entered the planning phase.
However, the corridor has generated
much controversy among many Texans,
including two representatives who
introduced a bill to solve some of
the more frequent criticisms of the
plan.
According to the Texas Department of
Transportation's Web site, the
planned Trans-Texas Corridor is to
be 4,000 miles long and could cost
between $145.2 billion to $183.5
billion. It will have six high-speed
toll lanes, six rail lines and
piping for gas, water, oil, electric
and telecommunications lines. The
corridor will run through East
Texas, parallel to Interstate 35.
"It is still being worked out in
legislation, but the state has
authorized the Department of
Transportation to move forward with
it," said Gabby Garcia, a
spokeswoman for TxDOT.
In June 2004, the Texas Republican
Party adopted a platform that is
specifically opposed to the corridor
and urged a repeal of the bill
behind it, House Bill 3588.
On Feb. 18, state representatives
Lois Kolkhorst, R-Brenham, and
Dennis Bonnen, R-Angleton, filed HB
1273, which, if passed, would slim
the corridor from 1,200 to 800 feet
wide, require access to every state
highway and FM road and ensure that
toll fees are not exclusively left
up to private developers.
Many groups, including the Texas
Farm Bureau, are worried about water
issues, economic damage to smaller
towns and counties because of lack
of exit ramps, use of private land
by the state, national security and
immigration issues and pollution.
Corridor Watch is one such group
that has challenged the corridor and
educated the public about its
possible ramifications. According to
its Web site, CorridorWatch.org, the
group is opposed to the corridor,
because "it is designed to generate
revenue first ... and it doesn't
solve the problem."
David Stall, spokesman for Corridor
Watch, said he believes that the
bill, if passed, would be a huge
step forward in making the corridor
more acceptable for Texans.
"It is an excellent starting point
for addressing the myriad of
concerns created by HB 3588 and the
Trans-Texas Corridor," Stall said.
"Representative Kolkhorst is to be
applauded for seriously considering
the concerns of Texans, not only in
her district but across the entire
state, and responding with the
introduction of meaningful
legislation."
Since the state estimates that the
population of Texas will double in
the next few decades, Perry said the
corridor, as proposed, is essential
to solve coming transportation
problems.
"We need a transportation system
that meets the needs of tomorrow,
not one that struggles to keep up
with the needs of yesterday," he
said on his official Web site.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAIR USE NOTICE.
This document may contain copyrighted material whose use has not
been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
CorridorWatch.org is making this article available for academic research purposes in our non-commercial,
non-profit, effort to advance the
understanding of government accountability, civil liberties, citizen
rights, social and environmental justice issues. We believe that
this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as
provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish
to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner. CorridorWatch.org does not express or imply that
CorridorWatch.org holds any claim of copyright on such material as
may appear on this page. |
This Page Last
Updated:
Tuesday May 29, 2007 |