As a member of the
River
of Trade Corridor Coalition, and on behalf of my organization, I
want to register my direct and strong opposition to the
development of any alternative highway or transportation system
that would divert vehicular traffic from and thereby threaten the
traditional and historic NAFTA trade route through Texas. Such a
diversion would directly threaten tens of thousands of small,
medium-sized and large businesses and the hundreds of thousands of
Texas jobs that they have created to service this well-established
International and domestic trade corridor.
The predominant,
traditional and historic NAFTA trade route extends north along
IH-35 from Laredo to San Antonio, Austin, Waco, Hillsboro and
northeast through southern Dallas County along IH-20, then north
along IH-635 to the intersection with Interstate 30 and then
northeast along Interstate 30 to Texarkana and the same in
reverse.
I stand firmly opposed to
an alternative route based upon the following reasons:
-
Every City and County
along the traditional NAFTA trade corridor in Texas has invested
millions (multiple billions collectively) of dollars in bonds
and other Financings and direct expenditures to support commerce
generated by this historic trade corridor. Streets, hospitals,
and schools have been built based upon the projected tax
revenues generated by traffic, trade and commerce along the
corridor.
-
Tens of thousands of
corporations and small businesses have been developed along the
historic NAFTA trade route. The livelihood of these businesses
and their hundreds of thousands of employees depends upon the
traffic traveling this traditional corridor.
-
Businesses operating
along this traditional NAFTA trade route and their employees
have made billions of dollars of private Investments along this
route. These businesses and their employees are the life-blood
of every community located along this route and within the State
of Texas.
-
Development of an
alternative transportation corridor will negatively impact
thousands of acres of productive, taxable land and thousands of
area residents. On the other hand, improving the existing NAFTA
trade corridor will utilize existing state and local assets and
disrupt few if any residents or businesses.
-
Many of us have spent
years and Incalculable time and effort to develop the NAFTA
River of Trade from Laredo to Texarkana via San Antonio, Austin,
and Dallas as a premier economic engine, one of the most
successful economic engines in the state and country.
Redirecting the very traffic and trade commerce that we have
worked so hard to create without close collaboration with local
governments and taxing authorities who are charged by federal
and state law and local charters with providing services such as
education, etc... is not only inappropriate but unconscionable.
-
Other factors which also
bear serious consideration include: the impact on land values
along the existing NAFTA corridor, the loss of sales tax
revenues, the diversion of assets and resources which could be
used to maintain and improve the existing NAFTA corridor, and
the impact that urban sprawl will have upon the areas where the
new Trans-Texas Corridor will be located.
Based upon these and many
other factors, I strongly oppose the pursuit of any alternative
highway / transportation route, including the one under
consideration by TxDOT that would divert traffic and commerce and
thereby adversely impact the traditional and historic NAFTA Trade
Corridor as above defined. I heartily endorse the improvement of
the existing NAFTA Trade Corridor and the improvement of the
interstate highway system already in existence today. I
respectfully request that the State of Texas cease any further
expenditure of State resources on development of the TTC-35 until
such time as it can be authoritatively and independently
demonstrated that said new corridor will not have an adverse
impact on the economies, commerce and economic health and vitality
of the cities and counties now located along the traditional and
historic NAFTA Trade Corridor.
I appreciate your time and
your consideration of these factors as you plan future
transportation systems for the State of Texas.
Note: The
first sentence of this Position Statement has been edited by
CorridorWatch.org. As shown above it accurately reflects the
content of a form letter circulated by the River of Trade Corridor
Coalition to its members. The Position Statement may have been
modified from this original form by individual member
organizations to more accurately reflect their specific concerns
and/or issues. CorridorWatch.org does not represent that any
organization has adopted the Position Statement exactly as
it appears here above. Please contact individual ROTCC
members to obtain their Resolution or statement of position.