February '04 TTC Public Hearings

Beginning February 5, 2004 in Duval and Montague Counties and ending on February 27, 2004 in Collingsworth County, TxDOT conducted a statewide blitz of "public hearings." All 254 counties were covered in just 23 days. Thirty-five "public hearings" were conducted on Tuesday, February 24th alone. [why?]

Most of these meetings were conducted by TxDOT's Area Engineers. In every case the TxDOT official read from a prepared script, distributed an eight-page handout, and showed a videotape presentation featuring Governor Perry and Transportation Commission Chairman Ric Williamson. [handout]

Citizens in attendance at many hearing had questions, issues and concerns. What they didn't have was good answers. At some hears, no answers at all. [more]

Beyond the script TxDOT officials were ill prepared to answer questions from the public in attendance.  Reports from across the state indicate that when they attempted to answer concerns and questions, the answers they gave were often in direct conflict with official TxDOT plans, statements and the position of the Texas Transportation Commission.  [examples]

Despite the absence of much public knowledge and understanding about this gigantic Corridor project, a few hearings were attended by citizens who had serious questions. Too bad they didn't get serious answers. 

TxDOT Does Poor Job of Attracting Public to Hearings

 
Concerns Expressed - TxDOT TTC Public Hearings: February 2004
  • Bee County: A story appearing in the Beeville Bee-Picayune under the headline, "Trans Texas Corridor hearing Citizens voice concern for immediate future." Local citizen and at least three members of Bee County Commissioner's Court listened in what was described as a packed courtroom to the canned TxDOT presentation. Dr. John Hester is quoted, "What you have presented here is beautiful pie in the sky. Rural areas like Beeville will be shorted again." County Judge Jimmy Martinez was quoted as saying, "I see frustration on the part of some of us here tonight."  County Commissioner Susan Stasny asked, "How are we going to be players in this system when we are from small rural America?"  [March 10, 2004; www.bee-picayune.com ]

  • Bell County: The Belton Journal reported more than 75 people attended their hearing. Among them was County Commissioner Richard Cortez [Cortese] quoted as saying, "I am concerned about what this could do to the county." Another participant was quoted, "Texans like their space and their cars. Texans will never ride a rail system." [February 26, 2004; www.beltonjournal.com ]

  • Brewster County: Under the headline, "Concerns raised on highway 'Corridor',"  Desert-Mountain Times reported Alpine Mayor Mickey Clouse as being worried about air pollution and safety issues involving truck traffic and hazardous materials. Jeff Davis County Commissioner Diane Lacy urged TxDOT to go around the area saying that local citizens would suffer the negative impact of such a corridor without receiving any benefit.   Commissioner Lacy also expressed concern about a non-elected authority being given the power of condemnation. Alpine City Councilwoman Nancy DeWitt described the corridor as "overkill."  [March 4, 2004, www.dmtimes.net ]

  • Colorado County: A Weimar Mercury article titled, Corridor Plan Draws Concerns reads, "No one among about 30 people at the meeting expressed support." "...individuals raised questions about the project's impact on landowners."  Columbus City Manager David Stall was quoted, "... local economies would be affected because there would be less traffic stopping for gasoline, food and lodging in local communities." "It's going to kill little towns," said a Justice of the Peace Frances Truchard. [February 19, 2004; www.weimarmercury.com ]

  • Cooke County: The Gainesville Daily Register quoted comments made by Community Development Director Carlos Vigil, "... this concept does not seem to consider the vitality of communities. The plan focuses on moving traffic at high speed. If it is done the way it's proposed, it will hurt us eventually because they (TXDOT) don't make provision for easy on and off (the Trans Texas Corridor) at Gainesville."  [February 18, 2004; www.gainesvilleregister.com ]

  • Fayette County: The Fayette County Record front page headline reads, "TxDOT Presents Corridor Plan To Overflow Crowd."  The Record reported, "Officials vague about location of corridor, most in crowd opposed to idea." Fayette County Judge Ed Janecka complained that he had only heard about the meeting (held on Ash Wednesday) a day earlier. The Judge is quoted, "... he wanted Gov. Rick Perry and top level executive from the Texas Transportation Commission and TxDOT available at the meeting to answer questions." Fayette County Resident Lane Gosnay  was quoted as saying, "... a lot of people don't understand the impact of the corridor. Who will answer our questions? she asked. And what are the water lines for? So you can suck our water out and send it somewhere else? It's also an easy way for a terrorist to knock out a bunch in one fell swoop." "It's a terrifying nightmare. I'm scared to death of this," said County Inspector Bill Durst. [March 2, 2004, www.fayettecountyrecord.com ]

  • Guadalupe County: The Seguin Gazette reported "Citizens expressed concerns about how the state will gain funding for a 4,000-mile transportation system given the financial struggle experience so far with SH 130." [February 26, 2004, seguingazette.com ]

  • Hill County: The Hillsboro Reporter quoted Hillsboro Mayor Will Lowrance as saying he didn't want to see local residents left out, "If there is no access to the small towns, it will change the face of the state." David Newman, a farmer was quoted as saying "... the state couldn't provide enough compensation if the corridors were going to split farms and force agriculture producers to drive miles out of the way to reach their land." Former County Judge Charles Herd echoed concerns of others and questioned funding.  According to the article the hearing, one of the largest in the Waco District, stretched two almost two hours and generated questions about property taking, effects on wildlife, effects on air quality and alternative transportation options. [February 26, 2004, www.hillsbororeporter.com ]

  • Tarrant County: An article appeared in the Star-Telegram titled, "Corridor plan's effects worry local leaders." Dallas City Councilwoman Lois Finkleman is quoted, "We support the concept of the Trans Texas Corridor, but we don't want it at the expense of all the urban transportation improvement that are needed." In reply the article reads, "State officials said that they welcome the ideas but the the goal of the corridor plan is to connect the regions of Texas, not solve traffic problems inside a metro area."  [February 13, 2004; www.dfw.com ]

  • Val Verde County: The Del Rio News-Herald reported that about twenty Del Rioans attended the hearing in Del Rio, "... with tourism and hundreds of other considerations ..." The article draws a comparison of small western towns that were economically strangled when, "passed over by the barons of the rails ..." It goes on to say, "... Interstate Highways, too, have choked the life out of hundreds of Texas burgs."  [February 29, 2004; www.delrionewsherald.com ]

 

 

 

 
Why Hold 254 Public Hearings?

Why indeed! 

"One of the pieces of 3588 required TxDOT to hold a public hearing in every county that's potentially going to be affected by the Trans Texas Corridor. They're in the midst of doing that now."
— John Langmore, 78th Legislature Transportation Policy Director
(Austin, March 4, 2004)

TxDOT is required to hold a meeting in each county that the Corridor may pass through before they can designate a route.  That law might as well read "hold only one meeting," as the application and effect would be the same. February's public hearing blitz has effectively satisfied the law. Now TxDOT is free to designate Corridor routes anywhere in the state without any legal requirement for additional meetings or public participation.

Sec. 227.013.  PUBLIC PARTICIPATION.  Before designating a route for a segment of the Trans-Texas Corridor, the department shall hold at least one public hearing in each county through which the segment may pass." — Texas Transportation Code [adopted by HB-3588]

Please note that this is not public participation in determining viability, economic impact, transportation need, on any other aspect of the Corridor — just route. Yes, there will likely be environmental hearings, but that will come after TxDOT has determined the route, at least in general terms, and set the land 'taking' process in motion.

 

Public Hearing Materials

An eight-page handout was provided to attendees at the February 2004 Trans Texas Corridor public hearings.  []

  • Cover Page: Trans-Texas Corridor logo.

  • Artist's Conception Drawing: Absent required barriers this depiction paints a 'pretty picture' of the Corridor.

  • Overview: Titled, "Phasing in the Future," touts lanes that 'could' separate cars and trucks, travel speeds up to 85 mph, reduction of air pollution, and enhanced aesthetics of co-located utilities.

  • Questions and Answers: Two pages of Q&A focus exclusively on routes not any other aspect of the Corridor. [why?]

  • Coloring Page: A full-page Texas state outline with markers for 31 cities. Directions, "Please draw three routes connecting the regions/cities that you think should be included in the Trans-Texas Corridor." [more]

  • Public Comments / Trans-Texas Corridor Hearing: A one-page, single-sided, comment sheet. Fifteen blank comment lines, five questions, and mailing list request. THIS IS IT ?!? — This is the public comment portion of the program. [more]

  • Transportation Opinion Survey: Eleven questions, four about the Corridor, three about transportation issues, and four demographic questions. All marketing questions - none ask for public opinion about whether the Trans Texas Corridor is a good idea or not.

COVER

Click on Image to Enlarge
Figure 1

Click on Image to Enlarge
Phasing in the Future

Click on Image to Enlarge
Q&A 1

Click on Image to Enlarge
Q&A 2

Click on Image to Enlarge
Coloring Page

Click on Image to Enlarge
Public Comments

Click on Image to Enlarge
Transportation Survey

Click on Image to Enlarge

Who At TxDOT Knows Anything?

(Not a rhetorical question) Pending.

 

Color Me A Picture

What is the purpose of this page?

What were they thinking? Is this intended to get a few hundred people to color in a few corridor routes that can later be used as a justification for spending $31 million dollars per mile? [cost]

These were county hearings. If you wanted REAL route input wouldn't a regional map with enough detail to see the affected county (reason for the hearing) and existing roads and landmarks be more helpful?

Why was everyone instructed to draw three lines? Why not two? Why not four?

Does TxDOT think this elementary school connect the dots exercise is valuable public input? Does the public? Did the state legislature color some of these maps for the Transportation Commission? If so I'd like to see them!

UPDATE: At the May 2004 meeting of the Transportation Commission we learned that TxDOT really does think this coloring page is valuable public input! So much so that he reported on the drawing in great detail and even prepared a new map for the Commissions review. According to Randall Dillard the director of TxDOT's Public Information Office, "Nearly 70 percent of the routes they drew reflected the Department's conceptual map. But they did have some other ideas as well."

[complete remarks]

Ask Me Another Question

Very little substance, okay nothing of substance, was disclosed about the Trans Texas Corridor project during the 'public hearings' held February 2004. If the citizens in attendance didn't already know something about the corridor and the far-reaching implications of recent changes in the law, the TxDOT folks certainly did little to enlighten them. They effectively said, "Here's our canned speech and a videotape, now tell us where you want us to build it. Just draw three lines on the Texas state outline provided. We left all the existing highways off the tiny map so they won't confuse you. When you're done pass them forward and we'll send 'em right off to our engineers in Austin so they can get started!"

There were five questions on the "Public Comments / Trans-Texas Corridor Hearing" form. Each participant was asked to answer these questions with an opinion ranging from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree.

  • "This hearing helped me better understand the overall transportation challenges in Texas."

  • "This hearing increased my understanding of the Trans-Texas Corridor project."

  • "Technical information was presented in understandable terms."

  • "Audio / visual aids enhanced the presentation."

  • "Overall, the presentation was worthwhile and informative."

More marketing. No one from TxDOT was asking any probing questions about the Corridor. Citizens weren't even asked if they thought is was a good idea or not. Clearly TxDOT is simply interested in how well they are selling this project.

UPDATE: At the May 2004 meeting of the Transportation Commission we learned the results of these questions. Here are some of the comments of Randall Dillard the director of TxDOT's Public Information Office:

"As I mentioned, attendees were given the opportunity to fill out a brief survey. I need to emphasize that this was not a survey of the general public. It was a survey of those that were interested enough in the Corridor to attend a public hearing. Still, there were some very interesting results.

"Ninety-three percent said that transportation is very important or somewhat important for economic development in the creation of jobs. Ninety-two percent said separate lanes for cars and trucks were very important or somewhat important. And nearly 70 percent said that they would be willing to pay a toll to drive in a car-only lane. Seventy-seven percent said rail was very important or somewhat important as a way to help reduce traffic congestion on our state highways.

"While those taking the survey were interested enough to attend a public hearing on the Trans-Texas Corridor, less than 10 percent said they had extensive knowledge about the Corridor. That's the same percentage that said they had no knowledge -- no prior knowledge of the Corridor.

"Of those that had prior knowledge, the feature they were most familiar with was the separate lanes for cars and trucks. That was followed by corridors connecting the state, but not cutting through the heart of our urban centers.

"Increased use of rail to reduce congestion on our highways, the idea of using tolls as a way to help fund transportation improvements, and the inclusion of utility corridors.

"We asked people to prioritize seven issues related to the Corridor plan. As you see, they want reduced traffic congestion, improved safety, economic development and the jobs that it creates, and they want safe transport of hazardous materials.

"It's interesting to note that the safe transport of hazardous materials was ranked even more important than improved air quality, which was ranked number six.

[complete remarks]

 

 

Thank you for your time and interest.

 

This Page Last Updated: Wednesday January 17, 2007

CorridorWatch.org
© 2004 Linda Stall - All Rights Reserved.