Texas Farm Bureau

During the business session (Dec.6,'04) of the state’s largest farm organization’s 71st annual convention the Texas Farm Bureau delegates “overwhelmingly rejected the statewide transportation and infrastructure plan” – the Trans Texas Corridor.

The Texas Farm Bureau release notes, “the disproportionate burdens the Trans Texas Corridor plan would impose upon rural Texans, delegates opposed the state acquiring additional farm and ranch lands through the power of eminent domain for the construction of the Corridor.” [news release]

Issues identified included, “additional time and cost related to moving equipment from one side of a farm or ranch to the other because of division by the corridor; economic damages due to the lack of exits to small Texas towns; additional tax burdens passed on to local taxpayers for property removed from the tax base; and the negative effect on wildlife and hunting in many areas of the state.”

“We feel it would be appropriate to improve existing state and federal transportation rights-of-way to help move the Texas transportation system forward,” delegates said. “We prefer no new rights-of-way for transportation corridors. However, if new rights-of-way are absolutely necessary, we would prefer additional space for corridors be located adjacent to existing rights-of-way.”

A story aired the morning of December 7, 2004, on the Texas State News (TSN) radio network reported that attempts to water down the opposition policy were shouted down by Farm Bureau delegates. The TSN headline, Texas Farm Bureau votes to kill the controversial Trans Texas Corridor.

A story in December 7th's San Antonio Express-News reports that “political heavyweights” Governor Rick Perry and U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison addressed more than 1,000 at the Texas Farm Bureau convention held at the Marriott Rivercenter. They called it, “a reminder of how powerful agricultural interests are in Texas.” [link]

Texas Farm Bureau Policy Position

We oppose the Trans Texas Corridor.  We oppose the acquiring of additional farm and ranch lands through the state powers of eminent domain for the construction of the Trans Texas Corridor.  Additional division of Texas farms, ranches, and rural communities by such projects as the Trans Texas Corridor would put undue burdens on the rural economies such as additional cost and time related to moving equipment and animals from one side of a farm or ranch to another because of a division in farm or ranch by the corridor, the lack of adequate exits to small Texas towns and their economies, and the additional tax burden passed on to the local tax payers for property removed from the tax base.  The addition of new rights-of-way such as the Trans Texas Corridor will negatively affect wildlife and hunting in many areas of the state in which hunting has become a major part of farm and ranch income.

We feel it would be appropriate to improve existing state and federal transportation rights-of-way to help move the Texas transportation system forward.  We prefer no new rights-of-way for transportation corridors: however, if new rights-of-way are absolutely necessary, we would prefer additional space for corridors be located adjacent to existing rights-of-way. (Passed as amended)

All interstate highways provide frontage roads on both sides of the highway for farm machinery.

(Passed as amended, December 6, 2004)

 

[Texas Farm Bureau News Release (12/13/2004)]

 

This Page Last Updated: Wednesday January 17, 2007

CorridorWatch.org
© 2004 Linda Stall - All Rights Reserved.