TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEETING
Dewitt Greer Building
125 East 11th Street
Austin, Texas
9:00 a.m. Thursday, December 14, 2000
Regular Meeting
COMMISSION MEMBERS:
JOHN W. JOHNSON, Chairman
ROBERT L. NICHOLS
DAVID M. LANEY
DEPARTMENT STAFF:
CHARLES W. HEALD, Executive Director
HELEN HAVELKA, Executive Assistant, Engineering Operations
PROCEEDINGS
MR. JOHNSON: It is 9:07 a.m. and I will call this
meeting of the Texas Transportation Commission to order. For the record, public
notice of this meeting containing all items of the agenda was filed with the
Office of the Secretary of State at 9:04 a.m. on December 6.
I would like to remind anyone who wishes to
address the commission at the open hearing portion of the meeting to please fill
out a card at the registration desk.
Before we get started, I'd like to ask my
colleagues on the commission if they have any comments that they would like to
make at this time.
MR. NICHOLS: Have a safe and merry Christmas.
That's really all I have.
MR. LANEY: Well, I'll echo that -- have a safe
and merry Christmas, and celebrate the conclusion of the exercise of last night.
We finally don't have a boss anymore; he's been elevated out of reach.
MR. JOHNSON: Promoted.
MR. LANEY: That's right, promoted out of reach.
So anyway, that was a great result.
MR. JOHNSON: On Tuesday I addressed a conference
in Houston dealing with I-69 and I wish I'd have thought of this then, but I got
to looking at the word "NAFTA Highway" which I-69 has been described as, and if
you take the word "NAFTA" and reverse the F and the N you have FANTA, and if you
ask Vanna White to get rid of the F and put an S there, you have SANTA. It
becomes the SANTA Highway.
And I made the remark that one of the main goals
of transportation planning is to give people alternatives, and I think if we
would take Corridor 18 or I-69 all the way through Canada to the North Pole, it
would give Santa an alternative route in case of inclement weather to make sure
that the children in Canada and the United States and Mexico get their Christmas
visit.
And with that thought in mind, I want to echo
what my colleagues have said in wishing everyone the happiest and safest of
holiday seasons.
MR. LANEY: That was pretty strange.
MR. JOHNSON: Do you want it stricken from the
record?
(General laughter.)
MR. JOHNSON: There is another issue that I would
like to bring before you prior to getting started. Commencing in January and for
the next few months, we will begin a new work group to help us better define our
transportation goals in Texas. That group will be made up of elected officials,
business leaders, and transportation experts from around the state and will help
us define and evaluate our mobility efforts.
The makeup of this work group is nearing
completion and the list of its current members in a more formal announcement is
available through our public information office.
It should come as no surprise to any Texan that
one of the biggest challenges is handling the growth we see on our state's
roadways. Our corridors need comprehensive attention and we must continue to
focus our efforts on rural transportation needs.
We need, in the simplest of terms, a plan that
helps Texans, the users of this massive transportation network, benefit the most
from the infrastructure we've built and will build in the future. That plan must
guide our focus in the ways that are meaningful and understanding to Texans, and
I think that is so important and I want to repeat it: the plan must guide our
focus in ways that are meaningful and understandable to Texans, and that is what
this work group will help us to define.
As we announced in October, the department is
already very involved in updating a transportation plan that will serve as a
blueprint for the system for the year 2025. Our expectation is that this work
group will complement that effort, giving us the input we need from the people
that we serve.
I would be remiss if I did not thank the
Governor's Office and Lieutenant Governor's Office and Senator Florence Shapiro
and her Senate State Affairs Committee for their assistance in helping us with
this idea.
I have high expectations for this group but even
higher expectations for the plans that will be crafted for all Texans. That out
of the way, we will proceed with our regular meeting.
Wes, I guess before we proceed, we'll entertain a
motion to approve the minutes of our November meeting.
MR. LANEY: So moved.
MR. NICHOLS: Second.
MR. JOHNSON: All in favor, signify by saying aye.
(A chorus of ayes.)
MR. JOHNSON: Those opposed, no.
(No response.)
MR. JOHNSON: Motion carries. Wes, I'll turn the
meeting over to you.
MR. HEALD: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Agenda item
number 2 under Aviation, appointment of two members to the Aviation Advisory
Committee, Dave Fulton.
MR. FULTON: Thank you, Wes. Good morning. My name
is David Fulton; I'm the director of the TxDOT Aviation Division.
This minute order appoints two members to the
Aviation Advisory Committee. The terms of two current members expired on August
31, 2000; therefore, it is necessary for the commission to appoint two members
for terms to expire on August 31, 2003.
Recommended for appointment are Col. Charles E.
Powell from San Angelo, and Ms. Corky C. Pledger from Addison. Both Col. Powell
and Ms. Pledger are here and have requested to briefly address the commission.
COL. POWELL: Thank you, David. And gentlemen, I
want you to know that it is a personal and professional privilege to be
considered for appointment to this. My name is Charles E. "Charlie" Powell from
San Angelo, Texas.
That's especially a privilege and compliment to
me since I come for primarily -- my professional career is from two non-profit
sectors: that's 34 years with the Department of Defense, and 20 years with Texas
banking.
(General laughter.)
COL. POWELL: I wish each of you a happy holiday.
I can assure you that if this appointment is made, I will work diligently with
our executive director Dave Fulton, with my co-committee person Ms. Corky
Pledger from Addison. And from my home to your home, happy holidays. It's a
great day in Texas history.
MR. JOHNSON: Thank you.
COL. POWELL: Thank you.
MS. PLEDGER: He's kind of a hard act to follow,
isn't he? My name is Corky Pledger, and we own an avionics business on Addison
Airport near Dallas. And I was first appointed to the committee on October 30 in
1997, and I have felt it to be such an honor to be on this committee and I feel
very honored to be asked to repeat.
I think that the committee is very important in
serving the communities and providing an opportunity for aviation users across
the state to learn about state and federal aviation programs. The committee also
provides citizens an opportunity to comment on aviation matters and to make
recommendations to TxDOT and the commission on the needs of the state aviation
system.
Once again, thank you so much for considering me
again.
MR. JOHNSON: Thank you.
MR. FULTON: With that, commissioners, I would
recommend their approval for your consideration.
MR. NICHOLS: I so move.
MR. LANEY: I second, but I'd like to make a
comment or two if I can. First of all, it takes a lot of time and effort and
energy to spend time on a committee that you all are on, and you wouldn't be
selected unless you were considered leaders in the community of interest that
you represent. I think all of us greatly appreciate your willingness to serve
and don't underestimate the value that you contribute to the state. We
appreciate it very, very much. Thank you.
MR. JOHNSON: Well said. There's a motion and a
second. All those in favor, signify by saying aye.
(A chorus of ayes.)
MR. JOHNSON: Motion carries. Thank you very much.
MR. HEALD: Item number 3, Public Transportation,
Margot Massey.
MS. MASSEY: Good morning. I'm Margot Massey of
the Public Transportation Division.
What we have for you this morning is a
recommendation to authorize the use of $1.1 million in toll credits to match
Congressional earmarks for capital projects for four transit systems: Brazos
Transit District, the City of Waco, the City of Lubbock, and the City of
Galveston.
These are very worthwhile projects; we recommend
your approval.
MR. JOHNSON: Any questions?
MR. NICHOLS: No.
MR. JOHNSON: Is there a motion?
MR. NICHOLS: I so move.
MR. LANEY: Second.
MR. JOHNSON: All in favor, signify by saying aye.
(A chorus of ayes.)
MR. JOHNSON: Motion carries. Thank you, Margot.
MR. HEALD: Under Promulgation of Administrative
Rules, item number 4, we have several minute orders for your consideration,
starting with 4(a)(1) Finance, and James Bass will present this.
MR. BASS: Good morning. For the record, I'm James
Bass, director of TxDOT's Finance Division.
This minute order proposes amendments to Section
5.43 and 5.44 of Title 43 of the Texas Administrative Code which deal with the
payment of fees to TxDOT for goods and services. These amendments would exempt
products sold through Texas Highways in order to prevent any conflict with
Section 23.27 which governs the sale of travel promotional materials.
This minute order will allow for the amendments
to be published in the Texas Register for the purpose of receiving public
comments, and staff recommends your approval.
MR. JOHNSON: Any questions?
MR. NICHOLS: So moved.
MR. LANEY: Seconded.
MR. JOHNSON: All in favor, signify by saying aye.
(A chorus of ayes.)
MR. JOHNSON: Motion carries.
MR. HEALD: Two more under Proposed Adoption,
4(a)(2) Contract Management, Robert Wilson.
MR. WILSON: Good morning. I'm Robert Wilson; I'm
the director of the Design Division and I'm presenting to you this morning
proposed rules changes to Section 9.31, Sections 9.33 to 9.38, and Sections 9.41
to 9.43 of the Texas Administrative Code concerning architectural engineering
and surveying contracts.
These proposed changes are as a result of
recommendations of a task force of TxDOT and consultant users of the process.
The proposals are to help streamline the process and help with consistency and
add flexibility in the process while remaining compliant with law.
If you approve this minute order, these proposed
rules will be advertised in the Texas Register for public comment and we would
hope to bring back final rules for your adoption at your February meeting. Staff
would recommend approval.
MR. JOHNSON: Any questions?
MR. NICHOLS: I had a question, or a comment.
Actually, I think I got most of my questions addressed by e-mail and stuff, and
that had to do with the time period for negotiation. As I read the proposed
rule, and actually, part of the rule we're currently under, we had 30 working
days for negotiation from notification period to signing of the contract, and I
was concerned that was not enough working days, but I was assured that if we
cancel negotiation with one firm and then go to a second firm for negotiation,
that the 30 working days begins again.
MR. WILSON: Yes, sir, that's right. We start the
30-day clock with a letter of notification to the selected firm so if we cease
negotiations with the first firm, we would issue a new letter of negotiation to
the second firm and start the 30-day clock over.
MR. NICHOLS: Okay. That was really the only thing
I had.
MR. JOHNSON: Can we have a motion?
MR. LANEY: So moved.
MR. NICHOLS: Second.
MR. JOHNSON: All in favor, signify by saying aye.
(A chorus of ayes.)
MR. JOHNSON: Motion carries. Thank you, Robert.
MR. HEALD: The last rules for proposed adoption
is agenda item number 4(a)(3), John Campbell, Right of Way.
MR. CAMPBELL: Good morning. I'm John Campbell,
director of the Right of Way Division.
I'd like to present for your consideration item
4(a)(3), minute order for the proposed adoption of rule revisions to 43 TAC
Chapter 21, Right of Way. The eight listed sections, which I'll spare the
recitation of, all pertain to the procedures and policy for accommodation of
public utility facilities on the right of way. Collectively, they're referred to
as the TxDOT Utility Accommodation Policy.
The substance of these rule revisions are to make
minor grammatical corrections and to reflect changes in department
organizational structure and references to business titles no longer used by the
department.
The Right of Way Division has reviewed the
proposed rule revisions and recommends your approval.
MR. JOHNSON: Any questions?
MR. NICHOLS: So moved.
MR. LANEY: Seconded.
MR. JOHNSON: All in favor, signify by saying aye.
(A chorus of ayes.)
MR. JOHNSON: Motion carries. John, thank you.
MR. HEALD: Rules for Final Adoption, item
4(b)(1), starting with Dave Fulton, under Chapter 1 Management.
MR. FULTON: Again for the record, my name is
David Fulton, director of the TxDOT Aviation Division.
Item 4(b)(1) Transportation Code Section 21.111
requires the Texas Transportation Commission or the commission's authorized
representative to hold a public hearing before approving financial assistance
for airport development grants and loans. The commission, by Minute Order
108315, dated September 28, 2000, proposed an amendment of departmental rules
delegating the authority to the Aviation Division director to conduct these
public hearings. No comments were received.
This item proposes final adoption of the proposed
rule change. We would recommend your approval of this minute order.
MR. JOHNSON: Any questions?
MR. NICHOLS: So moved.
MR. LANEY: Seconded.
MR. JOHNSON: All in favor, signify by saying aye.
(A chorus of ayes.)
MR. HEALD: 4(b)(2), Thomas Bohuslav, Contract
Management.
MR. BOHUSLAV: Good morning, commissioners. My
name is Thomas Bohuslav; I'm the director of the Construction Division.
Item 4(b)(2) is for rules proposed for final
adoption for amendments to Sections 9.11, 9.12, 9.14 through 9.16, and 9.18 of
Title 43 Texas Administrative Code. With the amendments we've clarified the
requirements for alternative bid items and rounding of bid prices and tie bids.
We've also modified bidder qualification requirements for waived projects.
The amendments were published in the October 12,
2000 issue of the Texas Register and no comments were received. Staff recommends
approval.
MR. JOHNSON: Any questions?
MR. LANEY: So moved.
MR. NICHOLS: Second.
MR. JOHNSON: All in favor, signify by saying aye.
(A chorus of ayes.)
MR. JOHNSON: Motion carries. Thank you, Thomas.
MR. HEALD: And the last rule for final adoption
being 4(b)(3), Jennifer Soldano.
MS. SOLDANO: Good morning. I'm Jennifer Soldano
and I'm the director of the Contract Services Office.
This minute order adopts amendments to Sections
9.80 through 9.83 and 9.85 through 9.87 and new 9.89 concerning contracts for
scientific real estate appraisal, right of way acquisition, and landscape
architectural services.
The amendments add appraisers to the types of
services that can be secured by the department with the use of a
precertification procedure and competitive sealed proposals. The amendments also
extend the time period that tasks or sub-tasks may be issued within a work
authorization for scientific service contracts.
The commission proposed these rules in September
and the rules were published in the Texas Register. No comments were received.
We recommend approval.
MR. JOHNSON: Any questions?
MR. LANEY: So moved.
MR. NICHOLS: Second.
MR. JOHNSON: All in favor, signify by saying aye.
(A chorus of ayes.)
MS. SOLDANO: Thank you.
MR. JOHNSON: Motion carries. Thank you, Jennifer.
MR. HEALD: And the last administrative rule,
under 4(c) Rule Review, Monty Chamberlain.
MR. CHAMBERLAIN: Good morning. For the record, my
name is Monty Chamberlain and I'm the business services manager for the Motor
Carrier Division.
The minute order before you concerns the
readoption of Title 43 Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 18, Motor Carriers,
and Chapter 28, Oversized and Overweight Vehicles and Loads. This readoption is
in concert with the requirement that state agencies readopt the rules every four
years.
The proposed rule was published in the Texas
Register on October 6 and no comments were received. At this time, staff is
submitting the minute order for your consideration and recommends approval.
MR. JOHNSON: Any questions?
MR. NICHOLS: So moved.
MR. LANEY: Seconded.
MR. JOHNSON: All in favor, signify by saying aye.
(A chorus of ayes.)
MR. JOHNSON: Motion carries. Thank you, Monty.
MR. CHAMBERLAIN: Thank you.
MR. HEALD: State Infrastructure Bank loan, item
5, James Bass.
MR. BASS: Again for the record, I'm James Bass,
director of TxDOT's Finance Division.
Item 5 seeks preliminary approval of a loan to
the Wise County Water Supply District in the amount of $4.15 million to fund the
relocation of utilities made necessary by the expansion and reconstruction of US
380.
The water supply district has requested an
interest rate of around 5.3 percent with a 20-year payback period. If approved,
staff would attempt to negotiate a shorter payback period than the one initially
requested by the water supply district. Staff would recommend your approval.
MR. JOHNSON: James, what is the longest maturity
we have on any of the SIB loans?
MR. BASS: The longest one is for the Laredo
International Bridge and I believe it's in excess of 20 -- I don't have the
exact number here, but it's in excess of 20 years.
MR. JOHNSON: Okay.
MR. LANEY: And how big is that loan?
MR. BASS: It's $29 million.
MR. LANEY: Yes, I was going to say, $30 million.
MR. JOHNSON: Any questions, other than those?
MR. LANEY: I would add, along the lines of your
comments, if you go back and renegotiate, I think that term that they've
proposed is way too long and the rate may be a little -- well, you'd settle the
rate.
MR. BASS: At this point in the preliminary
discussions there appear to be some unique circumstances that will have to be
further investigated. If the preliminary approval is granted and once
negotiations begin, we'll have to investigate those circumstances further, and
that may be one reason for the requested 20-year payback period.
MR. LANEY: So moved.
MR. NICHOLS: Second.
MR. JOHNSON: All in favor, signify by saying aye.
(A chorus of ayes.)
MR. JOHNSON: Motion carries. James, thank you.
MR. HEALD: Item number 6 under Transportation
Planning, there are three minute orders, and Al Luedecke, if you'll just go
ahead and handle all three of them.
MR. LUEDECKE: Good morning, commissioners. I'm Al
Luedecke, director of Planning and Programming Division.
In accordance with Section 201.602 of the Texas
Transportation Code, the commission conducted a public hearing on October 26,
2000, to receive testimony concerning the highway project selection process and
the relative importance of the various criteria on which the commission bases
its project selection decisions.
One participant provided oral comments and a
letter at the public hearing. This participant requested that on
participation-waived, equivalent-match, off-system bridge projects, the
commission allow local governments to seek waivers on both Priority 1 and
Priority 2 projects in the Unified Transportation Program.
Responses to the oral comments are shown in your
attached Exhibit A to the minute order, and no additional written comments were
received.
The minute order before you today establishes
that the proposed project selection process is consistent with the agency goals
to manage, develop and preserve the state's transportation system in a safe,
effective and environmentally sensitive manner and authorizes the project
selection process as shown in Exhibit B for the development of the Unified
Transportation Program.
We recommend your approval of this minute order.
MR. JOHNSON: Any questions, comments?
MR. NICHOLS: So moved.
MR. LANEY: Seconded.
MR. JOHNSON: All in favor, signify by saying aye.
(A chorus of ayes.)
MR. JOHNSON: Motion carries.
MR. LUEDECKE: Item 6(b) minute order authorizes
the use of fiscal 2001 Public Lands Highway Discretionary Funds for the
replacement of the Mineral Creek Bridge on County Road 441 in the Hagerman
National Wildlife Refuge.
The department receives Public Lands Highway
Discretionary Funds from the Federal Highway Administration to improve roads and
other facilities that provide access to areas served by the public lands
highways. Under this program the Federal Highway Administration selects projects
from various candidate projects submitted by the department and other states.
This nearly $230,000 award for the replacement of
the Mineral Creek Bridge is the first Public Lands Highway Fund the department
has received since 1989. We recommend your approval of this minute order.
MR. JOHNSON: Any questions?
MR. NICHOLS: I did have a question. I was
surprised when we did get this -- I think it's great -- but the point that you
just made that it's been eleven years since we've received something like this,
so it is very unusual. Is there anything that we can do to encourage more of
this from the fed; are there other areas that if we applied for or supported and
encouraged -- is there an application or process formula to bring more of this
money down?
MR. LUEDECKE: I don't have a good answer for you
right now; I'd have to look back on that. I know we've applied for it over the
years, but why we've not been selected I think is open to some question.
MR. NICHOLS: Did we apply for it every year?
MR. LUEDECKE: I believe we have, yes, sir.
MR. NICHOLS: I'd like to see something a little
further on this over the next few weeks or month to see what we might can do as
a commission to apply or try to get our point system up to try to get more of
this.
MR. LUEDECKE: Certainly.
MR. NICHOLS: Other than that, I move.
MR. JOHNSON: Do we normally apply for more than
one project in a given year?
MR. LUEDECKE: It's varied over the years but
normally we apply for a family of projects.
MR. LANEY: Do you have any sense of the total
amount granted for these kinds of projects nationally?
MR. LUEDECKE: No, sir, I don't at this time. I
can find out for you.
MR. LANEY: That would be great if you can add
that to whatever you're getting for Robert.
MR. LUEDECKE: We'll make that part of the
briefing.
MR. LANEY: Thanks.
MR. JOHNSON: We have a motion. Is there a second?
MR. LANEY: Second.
MR. JOHNSON: All in favor, signify by saying aye.
(A chorus of ayes.)
MR. JOHNSON: Motion carries.
MR. LUEDECKE: Item 6(c), the Port Authority
Advisory Committee was created in 1997 when Senate Bill 370 was passed by the
legislature. The purpose of the committee is to advise the commission and the
department on matters relating to port authorities.
The five-member committee must represent the
following geographic locations: one member for the Port of Houston Authority of
Harris County, two members from ports north of Matagorda-Calhoun county line,
and two members from south of that line.
The present committee was appointed by the
commission in staggered terms with future appointees to serve three-year terms.
Two members' terms will expire on December 31, 2000, making it necessary for the
commission to appoint one member representing the upper Texas coast and one
member representing the lower Texas coast.
Mr. John Roby is recommended as the appointee to
represent the upper Texas coast, and Mr. John LaRue is recommended as the
appointee for the lower Texas coast. Their terms would expire December 31, 2003,
and you have some background information on them there in your packet, and we
recommend your approval.
MR. LANEY: Are they here?
MR. LUEDECKE: I don't believe so, no, sir.
MR. LANEY: It must be harder to get here by boat
than by plane.
MR. LUEDECKE: They'd have to be coming upstream,
the way the rain’s been flowing.
MR. JOHNSON: The Colorado River’s frozen over.
(General laughter.)
MR. JOHNSON: Is there a motion?
MR. LANEY: So moved.
MR. NICHOLS: Second.
MR. JOHNSON: All in favor, signify by saying aye.
(A chorus of ayes.)
MR. JOHNSON: Motion carries. Al, thank you.
MR. HEALD: Item number 7, Award or Rejection of
Contracts, Thomas Bohuslav.
MR. BOHUSLAV: Good morning again, commissioners.
My name is Thomas Bohuslav; I'm the director of
the Construction Division.
Item 7(a)(1) is for consideration of the award or
rejection of highway maintenance contracts let on December 5 and 6, 2000, whose
engineers estimated costs are $300,000 or more. We had 13 projects, 53 bidders,
for an average of four bids per project. Staff recommends approval of all
projects.
MR. LANEY: So moved.
MR. NICHOLS: I'll second it, but I had a question
also. The question has to do with the percent underrun, almost 16 or 17 percent
below estimate, which is one of the probably largest underrun percentages I've
seen in a pretty good while.
Is there something going on that's reducing the
cost of some materials, or are we just getting better bids or a greater number
of bids that are better?
MR. BOHUSLAV: We are probably seeing more
competition. I can't speak to the actual underrun on these because it's really
project-dependent on how the engineer determines their estimate. Because we have
just 13 projects, one project could kind of bring them all down a lot. But we're
seeing an increase in bids, especially on larger projects, not necessarily
maintenance projects, and competition seems to be pretty good right now.
We're pretty much holding the line on our highway
cost index which is kind of our measure to see what cost of individual items of
work are, so we're kind of even on that. We're kind of being steady here for the
last maybe four or five months. The competition seems to be pretty good, though.
MR. NICHOLS: Okay. Well, I thought that was
pretty significant.
MR. JOHNSON: You're not encouraging bidders to be
more aggressively high in their bids, are you?
MR. NICHOLS: No.
(General laughter.)
MR. JOHNSON: There's a motion and a second. All
in favor, signify by saying aye.
(A chorus of ayes.)
MR. JOHNSON: Motion carries.
MR. BOHUSLAV: Item 7(a)(2) is for consideration
of the award or rejection of highway construction and building contracts let on
December 5 and 6, 2000 for a total number of 87 projects; we had an average of
4.39 bids per project.
We have one project we recommend for rejection;
that's project number 3042 in Ector County. This is a project that was 23
percent over; it included some crack seal work that would have to be performed
pretty late in the year. We didn't get a lot of competition because most of the
other crack seal contractors seemed to be busy with work or were unable to bid
this job.
The district would like to go back and redesign
it, take the crack seal work out, do some with state forces and then relet some
later on in the year, and then go back and relet the remaining portions of this
work this year later.
Staff recommends award of all projects with the
exception noted.
MR. JOHNSON: Any questions?
MR. NICHOLS: So moved.
MR. LANEY: Seconded.
MR. JOHNSON: All in favor, signify by saying aye.
(A chorus of ayes.)
MR. JOHNSON: Thank you, Thomas. Motion carries.
MR. HEALD: Item number 8, Routine Minute Orders,
I will handle these, as usual.
Starting with (a) Speed Zones, establish or alter
regulatory and construction speed zones on various sections of highways in the
state; (b) Load Zones, revise load zone restrictions on various roads and
bridges on the state highway system.
(c) Highway Relocation, this minute order
authorizes the Texas Department of Transportation to enter into the necessary
agreements with the Northwestern Resources Company for the purpose of relocating
a portion of FM 39 in Leon County.
There's a sketch there to show you. The
Northwestern Resource Company will pay the entire cost of this project; they
operate a lignite coal mine. This is in, I believe, the Bryan District.
Right of Way Disposition, Purchase and Lease, we
have two minute orders under this item. These two minute orders make findings
and determinations to approve the recommendation of TxDOT to declare the
remainder of two parcels needed for highway purposes as uneconomical remainders;
one being on State Highway 161.
This is to acquire 7,134 square feet of land from
Mr. Rundberg, and the whole property consists of something slightly over that,
being 8,348 square feet. Appraised value is $9,600, and we're recommending that
this be declared an uneconomical remainder.
Second, the department to acquire 4,496 square
feet from the trustee of the company of the Friends of Jesus, being the
landowner. The whole property consists of 6,253 square feet; the appraised value
is $45,000. And then we're asking that that be declared an uneconomical
remainder.
In Taylor County on FM 613, this minute order
provides for the sale of a three-acre surplus maintenance site and improvements
to the City of Tuscola, this being in the Abilene District. The appraised value
of $6,724 was established and $276 value of the improvements -- sounds like a
lot of improvements -- for a total value of $7,000, and the city has requested
that we sell them that for that appraised value.
MR. JOHNSON: Wes, I don't show the second item
that you mentioned on the agenda. Am I --
MR. HEALD: It's on that same sheet. You're
talking about that uneconomical remainder?
MR. JOHNSON: Yes. You have one in Dallas
County -- oh, it says two tracts of land.
MR. HEALD: When you go to the description in the
background information it's at the third paragraph under background information.
MR. JOHNSON: Thank you.
MR. HEALD: Eminent Domain Proceedings, request
for eminent domain proceedings on noncontrolled and controlled access highways,
and there again, there's a list there for your review.
And Mr. Chairman, that completes the routine
minute orders.
MR. JOHNSON: Any questions?
MR. NICHOLS: I had one comment, really; I didn't
have a question. It has to do with 8(b) Load Zones and the minute orders which
is a routine. Every month we have bridge inspectors inspect bridges across the
state, determine that they don't hold certain weights and they post them -- and
that's what we approve is for the formal posting -- to restrict the weights of
the trucks crossing those bridges because they're not safe.
Under separate law currently in Texas someone can
get a permit -- we refer to it as a 2060 permit -- which turns around and almost
negates the rule we pass which allows a 50- or a 60- or an 80,000 pound truck to
cross a 15- or 20,000 pound bridge. It's almost a paradox, very unsafe.
And I just want to make a point that the session
is coming up and that we think we have solved, from an industry standpoint, the
problem of getting to the areas that they need to through this but are
requesting the legislature to consider restricting the prohibition of heavy
weights going over these posted bridges. So even though we vote to approve this,
we have a method where people can cross them.
Other than that, I move we accept these.
MR. LANEY: Seconded.
MR. JOHNSON: Excellent observation, Robert.
There's a motion and a second. All in favor,
signify by saying aye.
(A chorus of ayes.)
MR. JOHNSON: Motion carries. Thank you.
MR. HEALD: We are asking you to call for an
executive session.
MR. JOHNSON: Prior to doing that, I want to
recognize somebody in the audience. I have a very able and understanding
partner, and I would like for Ann Johnson to stand up and be recognized. Thank
you.
(Applause.)
MR. JOHNSON: She is a school teacher and most
months is unable to attend, and I encouraged her to come see what goes on at
these meetings, and I'm glad that she was able to do that.
MR. LANEY: She'll never come back.
(General laughter.)
MR. JOHNSON: Is that the voice of experience? At
this time the meeting will be recessed for the commission to meet in executive
session pursuant to notice as given in the meeting agenda filed with the Office
of Secretary of State.
(Whereupon, at 9:41 a.m., the meeting was
recessed, to reconvene following the executive session.)
MR. JOHNSON: This meeting of the Texas
Transportation Commission is hereby reconvened. The commission has concluded its
executive session with no action being taken on any matter.
If there is no further business to come before
the commission, I will entertain a motion to adjourn.
MR. NICHOLS: So moved.
MR. LANEY: Seconded.
MR. JOHNSON: We will stand adjourned at 10:43
a.m.
(Whereupon, at 10:43 a.m., the meeting was
concluded.)
C E R T I F I C A T E
MEETING OF: Texas Transportation Commission
LOCATION: Austin, Texas
DATE: December 14, 2000
I do hereby certify that the foregoing pages,
numbers 1 through 35, inclusive, are the true, accurate, and complete transcript
prepared from the verbal recording made by electronic recording by Penny Bynum
before the Texas Department of Transportation.
12/18/00
(Transcriber) (Date)
On the Record Reporting, Inc.
3307 Northland, Suite 315
Austin, Texas 78731 |