The proposed Trans Texas Corridor did not find any fans, or any support, in Fort Bend County this week.

At public meetings hosted by the Texas Department of Transportation in both Katy and Rosenberg, speaker after speaker, many in emotional tones, voiced their opposition to the proposed transportation corridor. No one spoke up in support of the proposal at either meeting.

The Tuesday night session took place at Katy High School’s Performing Arts Center with over 200 residents in attendance. The evening before at the Rosenberg Civic and Convention Center, a similar crowd showed up to voice their opinions. In both cases, speakers lined up to tell transportation officials that the proposal was “un-American” and urged them to stop the project.

Many of the speakers said that the proposed 1,200-foot-wide network of roads, rail lines and utility rights-of-way would devastate communities, cause families to lose their land and pollute the environment. Some also said the plan would increase illegal immigration.

At the Katy meeting, Edward Dickey, who currently lives in Houston, said that he planned to retire to family-owned land in Weimar, but the TTC would effectively destroy his dream and the town.

“The town of Weimar would be wiped out by the corridor,” Dickey said.

He added that he would have to “pay a toll to visit my family.”

“The corridor divides families and splits Texas,” Dickey said.

He also read a statement he prepared based on Col. William B. Travis’ famous letter from the Alamo. In the letter, Dickey likened TxDOT to Santa Anna’s army and vowed “to die like a soldier” opposing the project.

Diane Hodge of Waller said that the corridor would destroy an 1880s-era home she and her husband have restored. She also said that people need to fight the plan much as colonists fought in the American Revolution.

“You are destroying a way of life that families have spent generations building. You are destroying food-producing ranches and farms for Americans and taxing them through tolls in return and not allowing them to even vote on whether or not they want your corridor,” Hodge told TxDOT officials. “These are the things that started the American Revolution, the seizing of houses and land and taxation without representation. If we need a new American Revolution to restore a government of the people, for the people and by the people, let it begin in Texas.”

State representatives Dwayne Bohac, Bill Calligari and John Zerwas joined residents in opposing the corridor. Waller County Commissioner Glenn Beckendorff presented a resolution from the Waller County Commissioners Court stating that body’s opposition to the plan, saying that it did not take into account the county’s mobility plan.

After the meeting, Katy resident Frank King said that there should be an investigation of both Gov. Rick Perry and TxDOT commissioners for their role in promoting the corridor.

“Nobody, and I mean nobody, has yet to step up and say that this is a good idea. Everyone is against it, but (TxDOT) and Perry keep trying to shove this thing down our throats,” King said. “Ask yourself why. Why fly in the face of the people who put you in office unless there’s another agenda? That’s what we need to find out.”

In Rosenberg, political activist Mike Currie was cheered when he called the corridor an agreement between the U.S., Mexico and Canada to promote what he called a future “North American Union.”

Larry Dubose said that the state is trampling people’s rights and confiscating their private property for the sake of international economics.

“Just when did we lose our rights as property-owners? I always thought that your homestead was your castle,” Dubose said. “Now (TxDOT) and the governor are saying that they can take our land if it’s for what they think is a better cause.”

Anable West called the plan and the process “ridiculous.”

“They’ve been having these meetings all over the state and there’s been an avalanche of people against it. Why do they continue pushing it?” West asked.

Area congressman Ron Paul (R-Lake Jackson) said he, too, is concerned where the money and the land will come from.

“One major concern I discussed a few weeks ago regarding the Trans Texas Corridor is where the land will come from. Another concern is where the money will come from,” Paul said “Official government websites for the TTC assure that public-private partnerships will shield the taxpayer from bearing too much of the cost burden, but a careful reading shows the door is definitely open to public funding sources, while at the same time there is no doubt of the intention to charge tolls on the road.”

The meetings were a part a series of 46 public hearings being held by TxDOT to receive public input on the draft environmental impact study for the corridor. TxDOT spokesperson Karen Othon said that the comments offered at the meetings, as well as in writing and from a specially-designated website, will be submitted to the Federal Highway Administration for their review.

The proposed Trans-Texas Corridor is designed to be a conduit for highways, rail lines and utility rights-of-way. As proposed, it would have separate lanes for passenger vehicles and commercial truck traffic, high speed commuter rail service and utility infrastructure for oil, gas, water, electricity and telecommunications services.

No funding has been allocated for what is expected to be a multi-billion dollar project.

FAIR USE NOTICE. This document may contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. CorridorWatch.org is making this article available for academic research purposes in our non-commercial, non-profit, effort to advance the understanding of government accountability, civil liberties, citizen rights, social and environmental justice issues. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. CorridorWatch.org does not express or imply that CorridorWatch.org holds any claim of copyright on such material as may appear on this page.