Challenging the Wisdom of the Trans Texas Corridor.

comment on this page or topic  

  Research Resources

[ HOME ]

INDEX: Articles by Date

 

most expressed concern with how much land the proposed project would require

 

Laredo TxDOT hearing draws 5 speakers

02/20/2008

By JASON BUCH, LAREDO MORNING TIMES

Of the five people who spoke Tuesday evening during the Texas Department of Public Safety's public hearing for Interstate 69/Trans Texas Corridor environmental impact statement, most expressed concern with how much land the proposed project would require. The purpose of the public hearing, held at Texas A&M International University, was to allow public input in the project's Stage I environmental impact statement, which will be submitted to the Federal Highway Administration, said project director Dieter Billek.

The I-69/TTC project will connect Texarkana to South Texas with roadways and rail lines and result in an expanded transportation corridor parallel to a large section of Interstate 35 in Texas.  

Attendees saw a brief presentation on the proposed project and were given an opportunity to ask TxDOT representatives questions before the public hearing. During the hearing, TxDOT employees were not allowed to respond to questions.

Participants were allowed to make written statements, give statements to a court reporter or speak publicly.

Clarence Earles, whose family owns a ranch near Zapata, said that he was concerned with the corridor's footprint. The department estimates that the project may require a right of way as wide as 1,200 feet. Earles said he worried the project would take excessive land from property owners.

Ranchers whose land is bisected by roadways may find accessing their property difficult, Earles said later.

"Hopefully, these comments, they'll take them to heart," Earles said afterward. "But I don't think it's going to stop the project."

The department is holding more than 40 public hearings throughout the state like the one in Laredo, Billek said.

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

FAIR USE NOTICE. This document may contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. CorridorWatch.org is making this article available for academic research purposes in our non-commercial, non-profit, effort to advance the understanding of government accountability, civil liberties, citizen rights, social and environmental justice issues. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. CorridorWatch.org does not express or imply that CorridorWatch.org holds any claim of copyright on such material as may appear on this page.

This Page Last Updated: Wednesday February 20, 2008

CorridorWatch.org
© 2004-2008 CorridorWatch.org - All Rights Reserved.