The author of the transportation bill sent an e-mail with two corrections to the interview I posted yesterday on the effect of the bill. Here are his comments:

In response to your question about how the moratorium effects the proposed managed lane projects in the San Antonio area, the post on the Burka Blog is technically correct, but misses an important point. It is my understanding that TxDOT planned on tying Hwy 1604 and Hwy 281 together into one CDA, so the post is accurate in that the bill would "derail a pending concession agreement." What was not pointed out in the post is that language in the bill would not prevent a CDA during the next two years on Hwy 281 only.

Additionally, I think it is important to point out a misunderstanding posted under the question "What did the governor's office get from the compromises in SB 792?"

The person interviewed answers that "(1) The bill limits the primacy of local toll authorities initially to a specified list of projects." This is not accurate. The bill allows the local authorities to complete the projects specifically listed in the bill without agreeing to business terms with TxDOT and then going through the market valuation process. In other words, the Harris County Toll Road Authority can complete the projects listed as they have done for 25 years without interference from TxDOT. Any projects not specifically named in the bill would be subject to the new process set forth in the bill while still giving local authorities the right of primacy or first refusal on those projects.

FAIR USE NOTICE. This document may contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. CorridorWatch.org is making this article available for academic research purposes in our non-commercial, non-profit, effort to advance the understanding of government accountability, civil liberties, citizen rights, social and environmental justice issues. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. CorridorWatch.org does not express or imply that CorridorWatch.org holds any claim of copyright on such material as may appear on this page.