Challenging the Wisdom of the Trans Texas Corridor.

comment on this page or topic  

  Environmental Defense

[ HOME ]

Environmental Defense Questions
Perryman Report: Moving Into Prosperity

On December 12, 2006, Environmental Defense offered their comments on the Moving Into Prosperity Report. In a three-page memorandum they discussed numerous concerns with the Report and gave reasons why the Report should be subject to extensive peer-review before it is used for decision-making purposes.

The Report’s Relies Upon A Discount Rate That Does Not Accurately Reflect The Actual Opportunity Cost of Capital To Private Road Developers.

The Report uses the Net Present Value (NPV) measure to compare the benefits and costs of the TTC project. Calculating NPV requires that all benefits and costs over the project's life-cycle to be discounted to the present using an appropriate discount rate. The Report mistakenly assumes that a 3% real (inflation-adjusted) discount rate reflects the actual opportunity cost of capital. While a 3% real discount rate may be appropriate if the TTC project were being financed entirely by the State of Texas, it does not accurately reflect the cost of capital for a project that is to be financed, in large part, by private road developers. According to the TTC-35 Master Development Plan, the private developer will pay all capital investment costs, including approximately $5.9 billion in initial engineering. Thus, the discount rate needs to reflect the private developers cost of capital - not the State's. Present values of costs and benefits 25 years in the future can be change by more than a factor of 5 depending on the discount rate used.

Environmental Defense Raises Numerous Concerns about the Moving Into Prosperity Report (12/12/06)

Report: Then there were two... Indiana Toll Road vs. Chicago Skyway: Analytical Review  of Two Public/Private Partnerships, A Story of Courage and Lost Opportunity (11/01/06) [NW Financial Group]

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
       

This Page Last Updated: Sunday December 31, 2006

CorridorWatch.org
© 2004-2006 CorridorWatch.org - All Rights Reserved.